From: Petr Rockai <prockai@redhat.com>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: LVM2/lib/metadata metadata-exported.h metadata.c
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:59:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874oupo3lm.fsf@mornfall.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090609142912.6297.qmail@sourceware.org> (wysochanski@sourceware.org's message of "9 Jun 2009 14:29:12 -0000")
wysochanski at sourceware.org writes:
> Various tools need to check for existence of a VG before doing something
> (vgsplit, vgrename, vgcreate). Currently we don't have an interface to
> check for existence, but the existence check is part of the vg_read* call(s).
> This patch is an attempt to pull out some of that functionality into a
> separate function, and hopefully simplify our vg_read interface, and
> move those patches along.
I must have missed the patches on lvm-devel? Anyway, the tool patches create
conflicts with the vg_read patches that are pending for months. Could people
*please* stop changing conflicting parts of the code (see also Milan's patch
that changes the recovery code which conflicts with vg_read)? You can perfectly
fine create patches on top of the vg_read changes if they obviously overlap...
Alternatively, we could of course discard the vg_read patches, but I haven't
seen any NAKs yet...
(I guess you may consider this to be a NAK for the related commits, until the
situation is resolved somehow...)
--
Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com
http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net
"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be
indented six feet downward and covered with dirt."
-- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 14:29 LVM2/lib/metadata metadata-exported.h metadata.c wysochanski
2009-06-09 14:59 ` Petr Rockai [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-29 22:41 wysochanski
2010-06-28 20:36 wysochanski
2010-05-19 11:52 wysochanski
2010-04-13 17:26 wysochanski
2009-07-26 2:02 wysochanski
2009-07-26 1:53 wysochanski
2009-07-15 17:26 agk
2009-07-15 6:10 mornfall
2009-07-10 21:19 wysochanski
2009-07-08 14:31 wysochanski
2009-07-08 14:28 wysochanski
2009-01-27 1:48 agk
2009-01-27 0:40 agk
2009-01-26 22:13 agk
2008-03-13 22:51 wysochanski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874oupo3lm.fsf@mornfall.net \
--to=prockai@redhat.com \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.