Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.

[Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>]

Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> writes:
> On 2007.10.31 22:39:06 +0300, Sergei Organov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I've made my first attempt at tracking my changes to upstream git
>> repository using git-fetch/git-rebase workflow. I did three commits to
>> my master branch, and then upstream incorporated two of them in slightly
>> modified form, so that some conflicts are to be expected. I did
>> git-fetch followed by git-rebase, and finally have got the end result I
>> hoped for, but there were some confusion along the way. I think I'd post
>> the log of the session here along with my thoughts so that an interested
>> person could see how it works for a newbie (my thoughts and non-git
>> actions at the time of rebasing are marked with 'me>' prefix):
>> 
>> $ git fetch
>> [...]
>> $ git rebase origin
>> First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
>> HEAD is now at 9c51414... Merge branch 'maint' into HEAD
>> 
>> Applying Fix a typo.
>> 
>> Wrote tree f5b2feefc021486eae9d2d84c69e0d6ead027a9d
>> Committed: 983e907b1360c17c7ac925d6035d82cc7243f406
>> 
>> Applying Use new syntax (-m option) for git-merge.
>> 
>> error: patch failed: Documentation/core-tutorial.txt:878
>> error: Documentation/core-tutorial.txt: patch does not apply
>> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
>> Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
>> Auto-merged Documentation/core-tutorial.txt
>> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in Documentation/core-tutorial.txt
>> Failed to merge in the changes.
>> Patch failed at 0002.
>> 
>> When you have resolved this problem run "git rebase --continue".
>> If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git rebase --skip".
>> To restore the original branch and stop rebasing run "git rebase --abort".
>> 
>> me> Nice, this conflict is expected.
>> me> Editing Documentation/core-tutorial.txt to resolve the
>> me> conflict... Conflict is resolved so that the working file matches
>> me> upstream version.
>> 
>> $ git rebase --continue
>> You must edit all merge conflicts and then
>> mark them as resolved using git add
>> 
>> me> Nice helpful message, -- need to do git-add
>> 
>> $ git add Documentation/core-tutorial.txt
>> $ git rebase --continue
>> 
>> Applying Use new syntax (-m option) for git-merge.
>> 
>> No changes - did you forget to use 'git add'?
>> 
>> When you have resolved this problem run "git rebase --continue".
>> If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git rebase --skip".
>> To restore the original branch and stop rebasing run "git rebase --abort".
>> 
>> me> What?! I just did the git-add! Moreover, before I did git-add, the
>> me> error was different and helpful. Something went wrong? 
>> me> Well, it's unlikely, but maybe I made a mistake of not specifying
>> me> the 'origin'?
>> 
>> $ git rebase --continue origin
>> 
>> Applying Use new syntax (-m option) for git-merge.
>> 
>> No changes - did you forget to use 'git add'?
>> 
>> When you have resolved this problem run "git rebase --continue".
>> If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git rebase --skip".
>> To restore the original branch and stop rebasing run "git rebase --abort".
>> 
>> me> No luck :( A few seconds of thinking... Hmm... no-op patch, do I
>> me> need to skip it? Let's try the --skip:
>> 
>> $ git rebase --skip
>> 
>> Applying Fix SYNOPSIS.
>> 
>> error: patch failed: Documentation/git-merge.txt:10
>> error: Documentation/git-merge.txt: patch does not apply
>> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
>> Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
>> Auto-merged Documentation/git-merge.txt
>> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in Documentation/git-merge.txt
>> Failed to merge in the changes.
>> Patch failed at 0003.
>> 
>> When you have resolved this problem run "git rebase --continue".
>> If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git rebase --skip".
>> To restore the original branch and stop rebasing run "git rebase --abort".
>> 
>> me> Aha, that's it! But why git didn't just skip the no-op patch
>
> It wasn't a no-op patch. It had conflicts which you resolved to the
> upstream version and _then_ you had a no-op.

Yes, and that's the problem. Why 'git --continue' didn't just skip this
patch that *already became no-op* after conflict resolution and forced
me to explicitly use 'git --skip' instead?

This forces one to use 'git --skip' if the patch happens to become a
no-op after conflict resolution, and 'git --continue' otherwise. Why
this complication?

-- 
Sergei.