From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103C53F7E7A for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773766832; cv=none; b=pAmyegXbfFADRDJEqM2sPDsa/JKe+qcqr4zZ9YL0Ab6O8dScUBjoSgwUiHo+XU73yNntHDQMh8dpKykyaD7tszuJgMeLdDLz63d6LlhTKL6m4oaIo3TUTcYPDxxqBeBvZkLjdYEP8XREEP23VawTIhsWF2ICw/v/SvLTHLBxlWk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773766832; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8CnX75WivjUzvwaUyCEHIQ6nrLCchXaZd4CnI186CL4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=S8uZfP+tUcNF2PyGxImE3Zj24tPAWfoUEQ6i3q1UMXqgsog3pLfjtyByuaL2hj8tGclugQlsvH9yGXnFDhK3/DhfL+8PjMAkegO5NrVg8E59v6hGDWlfacUzWQRLtAfGPOsUh3ay34Xp+PXLYnNo4lf0bFDctHouQzBGaTRihTA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=iyelnXym; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="iyelnXym" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3302940C7C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1773766830; bh=omgO+KHZUco5Y83s94riYkYUz/KySieY710Gv+iJa/U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=iyelnXym7GBfKF5Be6HH2v5YMMqySjbqOiu2WdOmGwt4dczEdK0nTXf3n3R8pGuxq fY4KWXofjbDIOAtEHN2SC7kswD9dhunVIOOTdt01d+WwwI/11xeK6SIlO+eykeREKy l6q3MzogEwZRDERno6/35WGhRnOOyxKj5zTcaRP82DKBYcTDYwNRoZseVizc2Zwj/J LN6wa8az7POvVv6+q/zp64aLURSRiMhYpXbYDQ0VRlzdhqfxMvLarTAj4HsSSBdp4t A290Pq/LmJ2Y0Y2kK0YlsXUh+Er12/GC2jW1HMQj2wfTdlhnLHQiqmNLcVOw/3LSG+ kvT1EE0fTLB0Q== Received: from localhost (c-71-229-227-126.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.229.227.126]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3302940C7C; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:00:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Pereira , Daniel Castro Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: pt_BR: translate process/1.Intro.rst In-Reply-To: References: <20260316212435.19303-1-arantescastro@gmail.com> <20260317140136.29256-1-arantescastro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:00:29 -0600 Message-ID: <875x6ubdci.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Daniel Pereira writes: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 11:02=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Castro wrote: >> > Thank you for sending the new version. Please review the following > crucial points before submitting v3: > > New Email for Each Version: Always send patches in a new email, > including the version number in the subject (e.g., [PATCH v3] docs: > pt_BR: translate process/1.Intro.rst). This is vital for community > tracking. Daniel did mark v2 correctly. A new version definitely should be sent as the start of a new thread, though, rather than as a reply to the previous. > Subheading Formatting: The misalignment in the subheading separators > persists (e.g., +Cr=C3=A9ditos/+--------). Please correct this. Looking at the patch: > + > +Cr=C3=A9ditos > +-------- > + >=20 ...I don't see the problem you are describing here? And again, please put comments like that inline, as I am doing here; that makes it far easier for everybody to follow what's going on. > Use checkpatch.pl: Always run the checkpatch.pl tool before > submitting. This is mandatory and will catch these style errors, > helping to prevent rejections. Good advice, but checkpatch doesn't emit any actionable suggestions for this patch...? All told, I don't see a reason not to apply this version, is there something I'm missing? Thanks, jon