From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, tom@herbertland.com,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
dsahern@kernel.org, makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] veth: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:32:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xjau5ub.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff5e6185-0dcb-4879-8031-bdb0b0edcec6@kernel.org>
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org> writes:
> On 11/04/2025 14.45, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 05:31:19PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>> In production, we're seeing TX drops on veth devices when the ptr_ring
>>> fills up. This can occur when NAPI mode is enabled, though it's
>>> relatively rare. However, with threaded NAPI - which we use in
>>> production - the drops become significantly more frequent.
>>>
>>> The underlying issue is that with threaded NAPI, the consumer often runs
>>> on a different CPU than the producer. This increases the likelihood of
>>> the ring filling up before the consumer gets scheduled, especially under
>>> load, leading to drops in veth_xmit() (ndo_start_xmit()).
>>>
>>> This patch introduces backpressure by returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY when the
>>> ring is full, signaling the qdisc layer to requeue the packet. The txq
>>> (netdev queue) is stopped in this condition and restarted once
>>> veth_poll() drains entries from the ring, ensuring coordination between
>>> NAPI and qdisc.
>>>
>>> Backpressure is only enabled when a qdisc is attached. Without a qdisc,
>>> the driver retains its original behavior - dropping packets immediately
>>> when the ring is full. This avoids unexpected behavior changes in setups
>>> without a configured qdisc.
>>>
>>> With a qdisc in place (e.g. fq, sfq) this allows Active Queue Management
>>> (AQM) to fairly schedule packets across flows and reduce collateral
>>> damage from elephant flows.
>>>
>>> A known limitation of this approach is that the full ring sits in front
>>> of the qdisc layer, effectively forming a FIFO buffer that introduces
>>> base latency. While AQM still improves fairness and mitigates flow
>>> dominance, the latency impact is measurable.
>>>
>>> In hardware drivers, this issue is typically addressed using BQL (Byte
>>> Queue Limits), which tracks in-flight bytes needed based on physical link
>>> rate. However, for virtual drivers like veth, there is no fixed bandwidth
>>> constraint - the bottleneck is CPU availability and the scheduler's ability
>>> to run the NAPI thread. It is unclear how effective BQL would be in this
>>> context.
>>>
>>> This patch serves as a first step toward addressing TX drops. Future work
>>> may explore adapting a BQL-like mechanism to better suit virtual devices
>>> like veth.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
>>
>> Thanks Jesper,
>>
>> It's very nice to see backpressure support being added here.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> @@ -874,9 +909,16 @@ static int veth_xdp_rcv(struct veth_rq *rq, int budget,
>>> struct veth_xdp_tx_bq *bq,
>>> struct veth_stats *stats)
>>> {
>>> + struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(rq->dev);
>>> + int queue_idx = rq->xdp_rxq.queue_index;
>>> + struct netdev_queue *peer_txq;
>>> + struct net_device *peer_dev;
>>> int i, done = 0, n_xdpf = 0;
>>> void *xdpf[VETH_XDP_BATCH];
>>>
>>> + peer_dev = priv->peer;
>>
>> I think you need to take into account RCU here.
>>
>> Sparse says:
>>
>> .../veth.c:919:18: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
>> .../veth.c:919:18: expected struct net_device *peer_dev
>> .../veth.c:919:18: got struct net_device [noderef] __rcu *peer
>>
>
> Is it correctly understood that I need an:
>
> peer_dev = rcu_dereference(priv->peer);
>
> And also wrap this in a RCU section (rcu_read_lock()) ?
Just the deref - softirq already counts as an RCU section, so no need
for an additional rcu_read_lock() :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-11 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 15:31 [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] veth: qdisc backpressure and qdisc check refactor Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] veth: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-11 12:45 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-11 13:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-11 14:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2025-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 2/2] net: sched: generalize check for no-op qdisc Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-08 15:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-04-09 13:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-09 13:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-04-11 12:48 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-11 12:59 ` [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] veth: qdisc backpressure and qdisc check refactor Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xjau5ub.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.