From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-184.mta1.migadu.com (out-184.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 722EA1DDC20 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.184 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738923097; cv=none; b=V75yn/TisAJkeMHQP2fTQilZ+EZoFcc8kkDN1EmlCMH0NdxmlgXBppSYdde8f2Rs5d4Gp7LbgXob4GRGjSjr7S+7VsjuNcX0OKDRRH/FwKOxJXUBOgNGcSm5QO/Hv20VVc2E3uTOK068Z9dOBIX8rm8IUWMnbaa1F3/iSFGC+ww= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738923097; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QIMUXutTjoK1uBfgDqh0i/yz2tCGrmsAvPh0MfVSHI0=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dFjSMy07fKjGETIaCWtjsZi7n7cTi09itBr24XPY/tppbT3MDhfVy1QexMc1M+6QUGsx893t9g1yYjX7TmwgS5iXDRnuMdUHoBWKfaCN9XfseHh/oKAA7HkmwNR66/2ETyGd01IsxLmBAe3IGzhOkX2NjBXdUocbgvCdLpiFl94= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=iotcl.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=iotcl.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iotcl.com header.i=@iotcl.com header.b=3Tm9YrIB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.184 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=iotcl.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=iotcl.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iotcl.com header.i=@iotcl.com header.b="3Tm9YrIB" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iotcl.com; s=key1; t=1738923092; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R9Ss8BhrBsqKtjrQaEsAT6EK70/yZaBHriZBk9mFIec=; b=3Tm9YrIBq0nm/4L5ExOIlfubaF0F/lwB5zvwcaWCcOFVWUBoDysFoRJqsJ40y7nh2Rch2G JuxbLLQeWyKkQb7kgj1HDMJAgTCVdlo7fUCp+CU4gI/0bp4XivK0FtdpusZ3wm7ld3CsXf qPZ5scNKRmaluqSIJBoMU1SMjWxAlNk= From: Toon Claes To: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2025, #01; Tue, 4) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 11:11:18 +0100 Message-ID: <875xlm3vzt.fsf@iotcl.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Junio C Hamano writes: > * ps/reftable-sans-compat-util (2025-02-03) 19 commits > - Makefile: skip reftable library for Coccinelle > - reftable: decouple from Git codebase by pulling in "compat/posix.h" > - git-compat-util.h: split out POSIX-emulating bits > - compat/mingw: split out POSIX-related bits > - reftable/basics: stop using `UNUSED` annotation > - reftable/basics: stop using `SWAP()` macro > - reftable/stack: stop using `sleep_millisec()` > - reftable/system: introduce `reftable_rand()` > - reftable/reader: stop using `ARRAY_SIZE()` macro > - reftable/basics: provide wrappers for big endian conversion > - reftable/basics: stop using `st_mult()` in array allocators > - reftable: stop using `BUG()` in trivial cases > - reftable/record: don't `BUG()` in `reftable_record_cmp()` > - reftable/record: stop using `BUG()` in `reftable_record_init()` > - reftable/record: stop using `COPY_ARRAY()` > - reftable/blocksource: stop using `xmmap()` > - reftable/stack: stop using `write_in_full()` > - reftable/stack: stop using `read_in_full()` > - Merge branch 'ps/reftable-sign-compare' into ps/reftable-sans-compat-util > > Make the code in reftable library less reliant on the service > routines it used to borrow from Git proper, to make it easier to > use by external users of the library. > > Will merge to 'next'? > source: <20250203-pks-reftable-drop-git-compat-util-v3-0-446c9ed4ee9e@pks.im> I gave v4 a round of review, and besides one question/possible suggestion these changes look good. -- Toon