From: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "Alex Lanzano" <lanzano.alex@gmail.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Derek J . Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
"Philip Müller" <philm@manjaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Provide chip info as configuration structure
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:49:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xpnbyyn.fsf@justinweiss.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241019123339.155c046c@jic23-huawei> (Jonathan Cameron's message of "Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:33:39 +0100")
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> writes:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:36:08 -0700
> Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com> wrote:
>
>> Prepare the bmi270 driver to support similar devices like the bmi260.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
> One thing in here. The enum ID thing tends to end up costing more than
> the benefit it brings, so for newer drivers preferred option is separate
> structure instances rather than an array.
That makes sense to me, even considering your comments on patch #4. I'll
switch to separate structures here and keep the if / else in that later
patch.
Justin
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> index 8ac20ad7ee94..2e8d85a4e419 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> @@ -10,10 +10,23 @@ struct device;
>> struct bmi270_data {
>> struct device *dev;
>> struct regmap *regmap;
>> + const struct bmi270_chip_info *chip_info;
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum bmi270_device_type {
>> + BMI270,
>
> Whilst quite a few drivers do it this way, over time we've found that it's
> much easier to just skip the array of structures and have independent ones.
> Increase the extern lines to one per supported device, but removes
> need for an enum here and generally gives slightly more readable code.
>
>
>> +};
>
>> };
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "bosch,bmi270" },
>> + { .compatible = "bosch,bmi270", .data = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI270] },
>
> After dropping the enum this just becomes &bmi270_chip_info
> and later you'll add bmi260_chip_info etc.
>
>> { }
>> };
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-19 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-18 23:36 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add i2c driver for Bosch BMI260 IMU Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Use INFO_SAMP_FREQ instead of INFO_FREQUENCY Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:48 ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Provide chip info as configuration structure Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:49 ` Justin Weiss [this message]
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: iio: imu: Add Bosch BMI260 Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:49 ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add support for BMI260 Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52 ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-20 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add triggered buffer for Bosch BMI270 IMU Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52 ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add scale and sampling frequency to " Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52 ` Justin Weiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xpnbyyn.fsf@justinweiss.com \
--to=justin@justinweiss.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lanzano.alex@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philm@manjaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.