From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Share ITS tables with a non-trusted hypervisor
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 15:43:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xqay61a.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR02MB41579C5C46B4F5F72A888743D4992@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Sep 09 2024 at 03:47, Michael Kelley wrote:
>> + ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)page_address(page),
>> + 1 << order);
>> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
>
> On the x86 side, the WARN is done in the implementation of
> set_memory_decrypted()/encrypted() so that each call site doesn't
> need to do the WARN. Each call site must only leak the memory
> if the return value indicates other than success. There are call sites
> in architecture neutral code (such as for swiotlb and DMA direct)
> that expect the WARN is in set_memory_decrypted()/encrypted().
> To recap a previous discussion, we want the WARN for notification,
> but also so the most security-conscious users can set
> kernel.panic_on_warn=1 to stop further processing if there are
> problems in the decryption/encryption operation.
What's the resolution of this?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-02 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 9:17 [PATCH 0/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Mark ITS tables as decrypted Steven Price
2024-09-05 9:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Share ITS tables with a non-trusted hypervisor Steven Price
2024-09-06 16:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-09-09 3:47 ` Michael Kelley
2024-10-02 13:43 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-10-02 13:59 ` Steven Price
2024-09-05 9:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Rely on genpool alignment Steven Price
2024-09-06 16:46 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xqay61a.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.