From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8EBC433FE for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:19:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=CoMutWCX8cwEcDBL/tXcPT69Oqafu87COWMVVtk0n0U=; b=C63rxlcRqs/OvQ pwwUNRruZWFiaM1K1zuTbMbi8D5LAs5B6SftMAh2OYTqdbzrgoLFDDwV1OCrCBDpSYxbzxFMCb6bQ lh6pVNuQbqkCnXaBidDH7/gdCr+Ya6GiCAEDZZkapXFmfRymQfC1iE6kAeFBwzr5e2sEwVsTYuty0 OO73FHiLRmCdAbhMsoB9bFGfI/jpOHajwA/e/Ep851iSfZeqKPOaP8duxkiTMN8HcfyGr1PvItm3E tRjsTymQChpvLBBdRPHjVCcPwwe4/Rps7eozV5AseaD6K7Z66/3PLMi7oJWkpgM0itFlVgT5wB5OW Sg1ASZmy1PXlGpT3WWgA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0Qjz-000vkF-QH; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:19:23 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0QjU-000vNc-BC for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:18:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB17B61D01; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5769AC433C1; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:18:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1669828731; bh=xh6HipE9Jb75qlFWvlf55aInyFX0fmqtese0m4gUxyY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=smgNIQC+mExQfP3XN3yjEnkpKTZGwN0HmfDTTSoWjynnlArhTQf8nkqWwSNcsgJ5i cgfafBBUOSKZIWzk0JTjyAI4bIC9DjY9g68M11VVxyie0w7omkaie/9C/qkrUhTtfg fJnq4d1koVf+afndK1pxoftAN1koA0EreP1hon09ksAA/tIgj+/mjuTYs+o74Pa+td FyD8op6Ae17r1yWzORt6qncqwM6AwZhgEscF+yOFTr2LRHLaT5fPHO5Ao3oiz8lI5m v98YONYUHsqmyN9JjLtsfGzUZAHA/u/OBI7ZOMDnMu1APjOiFWAJrEY8YiatMm13Oo EvMGlDW2arG0g== From: Kalle Valo To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ath11k vs ar_qrtr? References: <20221130122807.GA31720@lst.de> <87o7so4nr2.fsf@kernel.org> <20221130125236.GA865@lst.de> <87k03c4mdb.fsf@kernel.org> <20221130132244.GB3055@lst.de> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:18:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20221130132244.GB3055@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:22:44 +0100") Message-ID: <875yewnyx4.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221130_091852_448046_88230886 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.18 ) X-BeenThere: ath11k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+ath11k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:12:32PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Heh, I'm learning something new here. But I wonder why nobody else has >> seen this? > > Good question. How common is the ath11k hardware, especially on latptop > where it is required for installation given that only installers tend > to split up driver is non-standard ways. I'm not sure about exact numbers, but not very common. I have seen something like 4-5 different laptop models with either QCA6390 or WCN6855 (both ath11k PCI devices). The PCI support was added to ath11k in v5.10 (released Dec 2020) so maybe installers haven't caught up yet? Just guessing though. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches -- ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C286C4321E for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229468AbiK3RTA (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:19:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45074 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229629AbiK3RS5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:18:57 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C22A624B for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B444161D0D for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5769AC433C1; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:18:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1669828731; bh=xh6HipE9Jb75qlFWvlf55aInyFX0fmqtese0m4gUxyY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=smgNIQC+mExQfP3XN3yjEnkpKTZGwN0HmfDTTSoWjynnlArhTQf8nkqWwSNcsgJ5i cgfafBBUOSKZIWzk0JTjyAI4bIC9DjY9g68M11VVxyie0w7omkaie/9C/qkrUhTtfg fJnq4d1koVf+afndK1pxoftAN1koA0EreP1hon09ksAA/tIgj+/mjuTYs+o74Pa+td FyD8op6Ae17r1yWzORt6qncqwM6AwZhgEscF+yOFTr2LRHLaT5fPHO5Ao3oiz8lI5m v98YONYUHsqmyN9JjLtsfGzUZAHA/u/OBI7ZOMDnMu1APjOiFWAJrEY8YiatMm13Oo EvMGlDW2arG0g== From: Kalle Valo To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ath11k vs ar_qrtr? References: <20221130122807.GA31720@lst.de> <87o7so4nr2.fsf@kernel.org> <20221130125236.GA865@lst.de> <87k03c4mdb.fsf@kernel.org> <20221130132244.GB3055@lst.de> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:18:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20221130132244.GB3055@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:22:44 +0100") Message-ID: <875yewnyx4.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:12:32PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Heh, I'm learning something new here. But I wonder why nobody else has >> seen this? > > Good question. How common is the ath11k hardware, especially on latptop > where it is required for installation given that only installers tend > to split up driver is non-standard ways. I'm not sure about exact numbers, but not very common. I have seen something like 4-5 different laptop models with either QCA6390 or WCN6855 (both ath11k PCI devices). The PCI support was added to ath11k in v5.10 (released Dec 2020) so maybe installers haven't caught up yet? Just guessing though. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches