Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap.c: Update comments in filemap_fault()

[Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>]

Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 05:12:33PM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
>> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
>> @@ -3168,8 +3168,9 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_contains(folio, index), folio);
>>
>>  	/*
>> -	 * We have a locked page in the page cache, now we need to check
>> -	 * that it's up-to-date. If not, it is going to be due to an error.
>> +	 * We have a locked page in the page cache. Check that it's up-to-date.
>> +	 * If not it is because there was no page in the page cache (only likely
>> +	 * in the case of MADV_RANDOM) or due to error.
>
> The comment is correct, but the code is buggy!

Ha!

> We should be calling page_cache_ra_order() in do_sync_mmap_readahead(),
> even if VM_RAND_READ is set (or !ra_pages, or mmap_miss is high).
> At least for one page.  That would allow us to drop the FGP_FOR_MMAP
> flag as page_cache_ra_order() will instantiate a folio for us.
>
> Do you want to write that patch or should I do it?

Thanks for the pointers, I can do it.

 - Alistair