From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE42C433EF for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44234 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqAXR-00057J-Cv for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:55:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqAVy-0004MU-Qe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:53:59 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:28021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqAVv-0006Yc-5I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:53:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1637830433; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UNzhcDr/TUOc+AnUPMigVrjJCMEuO7axwbbBq+JTA7U=; b=hTwqS00a7vGQAmQ1jEGlwzzhSesfJ9Lhfw2iIoME4ERHSvC/jXV9KxHEAcCG9nv9PVnzpM dMX4gCR08FHALy3nZpcX6QXQylXLDdjW+uvOEPe1DT1gW7UkIpx3acpKMOpTIVg4/h3qDA HNt3o8SX0qlrFhTsK0Y7T4NQrbkTo+o= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-232-QODMWiXkOY-qHbFVH2Vc7g-1; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:53:50 -0500 X-MC-Unique: QODMWiXkOY-qHbFVH2Vc7g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CA21006AB7; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-112-7.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.7]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16B0C5D6CF; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9276F11380A7; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:53:47 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Rename default_bus_bypass_iommu References: <20210811085842.2511545-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <871r34r9pz.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:53:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jean-Philippe Brucker's message of "Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:39:28 +0000") Message-ID: <875ysgpqec.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.7, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Jean-Philippe Brucker writes: > Hi Markus, > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 08:11:04AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Peter, this patch fixes a bug that became a regression when the fix >> missed 6.1. It's been stuck on the list since August. Please have a >> look, and if it's good, get it merged. I'll ask the i386/pc maintainers >> to do the same for PATCH 2. > > Both fixes have been merged in v6.2 (9dad363a223d and 739b38630c45) I'm cross-eyed this morning. Thanks!