From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF168C388F9 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4944A22275 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="eQTt31OX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4944A22275 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZWse-0001WT-AC for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 05:16:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZWd2-0007DT-Ht for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 04:59:56 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:60147) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZWd0-00023J-1S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 04:59:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604311192; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=p7N+8h+oqreD6FW464wyeo6wUQ4uuZC1MRyd4fCUbIA=; b=eQTt31OXxOQiEEsB0fZQQi62W+XvsQNBfHrlVp0oy1Yc5+0jnHlDz1CFhiMn2ysSxAyBWa Nl23fapFbsRawmMwx23CcpwsuayfUODkF7l6DmqSZZ6wO2W3tpdhbsfa2neItCbixkC7nh 9qgPygXrxay6LzynlnS7EdGd9hLytiA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-455-7a4T4Y2bNoe_DTATvUrt-w-1; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 04:59:51 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 7a4T4Y2bNoe_DTATvUrt-w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E211891E90; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-112-103.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.103]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C69485D9DD; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4EBAF1132BD6; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:59:43 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp References: <20201029133833.3450220-1-armbru@redhat.com> <87pn50vxa0.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20201030102049.GI99222@redhat.com> <87zh40no5a.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20201102091804.GC134709@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:59:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201102091804.GC134709@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Be?= =?utf-8?Q?rrang=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:18:04 +0000") Message-ID: <875z6om640.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/02 01:33:03 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , xiaoqiang zhao , QEMU , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Gerd Hoffmann , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: >>=20 >> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:11:19AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau writes: >> >>=20 >> >> > Hi Markus, >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 5:43 PM Markus Armbruster wrote: [...] >> >> >> Regardless, I *will* make time for ripping the feature out if we >> >> >> decide to do that. Quick & easy way to avoid reviewing this serie= s >> >> >> *hint* *hint*. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > well, fwiw, I would also take that approach too, to the risk of ups= etting >> >> > the users. >> >>=20 >> >> Reverting the feature requires rough consensus and a patch. >> >>=20 >> >> I can provide a patch, but let's give everybody a chance to object >> >> first. >>=20 >> Daniel, do you object, yes or no? > > Yes, I object to removing the feature as it is clearly useful. Thanks. I sent v2 of my fixes. Can you take care of getting them merged, hopefully in time for 5.2?