From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Python 3.5 EOL; when can require 3.6?
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:43:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875z8eupyp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
We require Python 3.5. It will reach its "end of life" at the end of
September 2020[*]. Any reason not to require 3.6 for 5.2? qemu-iotests
already does for its Python parts.
[*] https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3510/
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 7:43 Markus Armbruster [this message]
2020-09-16 7:53 ` Python 3.5 EOL; when can require 3.6? Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-16 8:02 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-16 13:53 ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-16 13:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 14:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-16 8:22 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-16 15:09 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-16 7:54 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 9:50 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 9:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 9:55 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 12:30 ` Peter Maydell
2020-09-16 13:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-16 14:00 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 14:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 14:57 ` John Snow
2020-09-17 14:10 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 14:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 15:24 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 15:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 15:41 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 15:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-17 15:39 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 15:42 ` Warner Losh
2020-09-17 16:07 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-17 16:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 17:02 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-17 16:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-17 16:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 16:50 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875z8eupyp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.