From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63EBC04AB5 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 17:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 830D020693 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 17:04:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 830D020693 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35377 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYvoe-0004ew-RM for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 13:04:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34317) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYvmX-0003Ye-Bz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 13:02:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYvmT-0000ze-NZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 13:02:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYvmR-0000Zo-NI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 13:02:25 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4F8E3E00; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 17:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-116-148.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.148]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C610163F75; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 17:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5936C11386A0; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 19:01:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Stafford Horne References: <20190529150853.9772-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20190529150853.9772-3-armbru@redhat.com> <20190531033601.GB3379@lianli.shorne-pla.net> <30db7d52-b304-da2d-f84d-42a57dc28135@redhat.com> <20190604103349.GD3379@lianli.shorne-pla.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 19:01:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190604103349.GD3379@lianli.shorne-pla.net> (Stafford Horne's message of "Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:33:49 +0900") Message-ID: <875zpik5qa.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 06 Jun 2019 17:01:54 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: Improve section headlines X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Stafford Horne writes: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:45:14AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wro= te: >> On 5/31/19 5:36 AM, Stafford Horne wrote: >> > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> When scripts/get_maintainer.pl reports something like >> >> >> >> John Doe (maintainer:Overall) >> >> >> >> the user is left to wonder *which* of our three "Overall" sections >> >> applies. We have three, one each under "Guest CPU cores (TCG)", >> >> "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)", and "Overall usermode emulation". >> >> >> >> Rename sections under >> >> >> >> * "Guest CPU cores (TCG)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (TCG)" >> >> >> >> * "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (KVM)" >> >> >> >> * "Guest CPU Cores (Xen)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (Xen)" >> >> >> >> * "Architecture support" from "FOO" to "FOO general architecture >> >> support" >> >> >> >> * "Tiny Code Generator (TCG)" from "FOO target" to "FOO TCG target" >> >> >> >> While there, >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> >> --- >> >> MAINTAINERS | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------= -- >> >> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) >> >=20 >> > ...=20 >> >=20 >> >> -OpenRISC >> >> +OpenRISC CPU cores (TCG) >> >> M: Stafford Horne >> >> S: Odd Fixes >> >> F: target/openrisc/ >> >> F: hw/openrisc/ >> >> F: tests/tcg/openrisc/ >> >>=20=20 >> >=20 >> > As directories listed there I look over both target/ (TCG?) and hw/. >> > Would it be better to be 'OpenRISC general architecture'? >>=20 >> There is a historical separation between target/ and hw/ because they >> cover different concepts, and have different maintainers/reviewers. >>=20 >> - target/$arch/ is for TCG/KVM >> - hw/ is for machines and their devices >> (some devices are reused by multiple archs) >>=20 >> Although the separation is not always clear (some devices are tied to an >> architecture, some architecture instruction directly access devices) I'd >> prefer we keep 2 distincts MAINTAINERS sections (keeping you maintainer >> of both). This will ease developper with specific background/interests >> to volunteer to a particular section. > > Hello, > > Thanks for the explaination. I think it makes sense to have 2 different > maintainer sections. In that case should this patch be amended to move t= he > 'F: hw/openrisc/' etc out to a different section with the different heade= r? This patch merely improves headlines. Splitting up the OpenRISC section above should be separate. Care to send the patch?