From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLvLn-00074n-M7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 14:52:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLvLl-0001Uv-2t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 14:52:35 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:59190 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLvLk-0001Uh-Uc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 14:52:33 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F58C4022407 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 18:52:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <64410e07-30ba-c714-e3f4-99149ad22a76@redhat.com> (John Snow's message of "Thu, 24 May 2018 13:50:08 -0400") References: <20180523091411.1073-1-quintela@redhat.com> <64410e07-30ba-c714-e3f4-99149ad22a76@redhat.com> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 20:52:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87603cvqc4.fsf@secure.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: fix exec/fd migrations List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Snow Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lvivier@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com John Snow wrote: > On 05/23/2018 05:14 AM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Commit: >> >> commit 36c2f8be2c4eb0003ac77a14910842b7ddd7337e >> Author: Juan Quintela >> Date: Wed Mar 7 08:40:52 2018 +0100 >> >> migration: Delay start of migration main routines >> >> Missed tcp and fd transports. This fix its. >> >> Reported-by: Kevin Wolf >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela > > Fixes things for me, but I see that Peter Xu has more concerns. > > Would be happy with checking this in for now and following up with > better refactors so that iotests works again in the meantime. > > Tested-by: John Snow That is my plan. Will send a pull request Tomorrow, and we can go from there. Peter suggestion is good but requires developtemt and testing. Thanks, Juan.