From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3tTSnf45WnzDvxC for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 04:58:14 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [IPv6:2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3tTSnd6pL1z9t0J for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 04:58:13 +1100 (AEDT) From: Andreas Schwab To: David Laight Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "linuxppc-dev\@ozlabs.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] adb: properly mark continued kernel messages References: <87r35ynzoe.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1480200189.11342.4.camel@au1.ibm.com> <87oa0zpcvg.fsf_-_@linux-m68k.org> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DB02303EA@AcuExch.aculab.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:58:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DB02303EA@AcuExch.aculab.com> (David Laight's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:50:41 +0000") Message-ID: <8760n4df4g.fsf@linux-m68k.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Nov 30 2016, David Laight wrote: > Doesn't pr_cont() have its own major problem - garbled messages if > there are concurrent writers? > So it is best avoided if at all possible. You are free to submit a followup patch the rework the messaging. My patch is a strict improvement. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."