From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNyo-0001aX-OR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:46:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNyk-0005kJ-No for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:46:46 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNyk-0005kD-I7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:46:42 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 182D2C804 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:46:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <20160204171617.GM26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160204195522-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160204190944.GO26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160204221416.GA21272@redhat.com> <20160205144611.GQ26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160206201057-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160211155130.GA6239@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160211183032-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <87twleci0k.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <87ziuygtcj.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <20160218120714.GA25803@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:46:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160218120714.GA25803@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:07:14 +0200") Message-ID: <8760xmfaog.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] q35: Remove old machines and unused compat code List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , Laszlo Ersek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov , Paolo Bonzini , John Snow "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:18:04PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> No reply from you since Monday. > > Yes but I'm flooded with other stuff to review. I'll get back to it, > 3 days isn't such a long time. > >> You can >> >> (a) Apply Eduardo's series. >> >> (b) Debate its merits. >> >> (c) Declare the debate stuck, and put it on the agenda for the next KVM >> call. >> >> (d) Other (do tell). > > Thinking it over on the weekend can't hurt, so I intend to do this. We've debated this for six months, so taking a few more days to mull it over some more won't make a difference. > Meanwhile, you could help by reviewing the patchset and sending > acks on list (maybe you did, but I can't find it). I thought I had sent out my R-by long ago. Looks like I haven't (my bad), so I did so just now, after re-checking the patches. >> What you can't do make the problem go away by ignoring it. It hasn't >> gone away for six months and two releases. > > I don't think there's a problem as such - the patchset is just supposed > to simplify maintainance - but I don't intend to ignore the patchset. Thanks!