All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Tomas M <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case.
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:22:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <876107wvkp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFCWdWcGDcU-jpDCS_VL-oJptp9K6pv9JK+a-UFTEefd=wtMUQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Tomas M <tmezzadra@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any special reason this has not been merged yet?

No special reason. There's just the ordinary reason there is no review
on the patch yet.

BR,
Jani.



>
> Regards
>
> Tomas
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Op 13-11-15 om 14:28 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira:
>> >> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> >>> Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira:
>> >>>> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> >>>>> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet,
>> >>>>> and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary
>> plane.
>> >>>> So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent
>> modeset to
>> >>>> enable
>> >>>> the primary again?
>> >>> Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it
>> should
>> >>> really be set to false afterwards.
>> >> So basically I didn't understand how the wrong value of
>> plane_state->visible
>> >> causes the bug that was mentioned. I think a brief explanation in the
>> commit
>> >> message would be good.
>> > Well, apply with git am --scissors. Same patch but mentioning this.
>> >
>> > Is this better?
>>
>> Ander, ping?
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>> > ---->8-----
>> >
>> > When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not correct yet,
>> > and plane_state->visible = true is left as true after disabling
>> > the primary plane.
>> >
>> > Other planes are already disabled as part of crtc sanitization, only the
>> > primary is left active. But the plane_mask is not updated here. It gets
>> updated
>> > during fb takeover in modeset_gem_init, or set to the new value on
>> resume.
>> >
>> > This means that to disable the primary plane 1 <<
>> drm_plane_index(primary)
>> > needs to be used.
>> >
>> > Afterwards because the crtc is no longer active it's forbidden to keep
>> > plane_state->visible set, or a WARN_ON in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes
>> > triggers. There are other code points that rely on accurate
>> plane_state->visible
>> > too, so make sure the bool is cleared.
>> >
>> >
>> > The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so
>> > they don't have to be handled here.
>> >
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2?
>> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655
>> > Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct
>> drm_crtc *crtc)
>> >               WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work);
>> >
>> >               intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc);
>> > +
>> > +             intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 <<
>> drm_plane_index(crtc->primary));
>> > +             to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible =
>> false;
>> >       }
>> >
>> > -     intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask);
>> >       dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc);
>> >       intel_crtc->active = false;
>> >       intel_update_watermarks(crtc);
>> > -- 2.1.0
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-09 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-11 14:36 [PATCH] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-12 13:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-12 13:58   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-13 13:28     ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-23  9:25       ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-23  9:25         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-12-01  9:07         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2015-12-09 13:25           ` Tomas M
2015-12-09 14:22             ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2015-12-10  8:33         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2015-12-10 12:47           ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-10 12:47             ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=876107wvkp.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=conselvan2@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmezzadra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.