All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <8761dit9u9.fsf@nbsps.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index af6c63d..61269e4 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
 
->>>> On 17 Sep 2014, stefan@agner.ch wrote:
+>>>> On 17 Sep 2014, stefan at agner.ch wrote:
 
 >>> Yes, we are using Macronix SLC NAND.
 
->>>> On 17 Sep 2014, stefan@agner.ch wrote:
+>>>> On 17 Sep 2014, stefan at agner.ch wrote:
 
 >>> This is a new device, but its one out of several dozens. The device
 >>> had two factory marked bad page. This four page would then be 6 bad
 >>> pages. I would say that your guess is probably the case at hand
 >>> (should be considered bad, but were marked by factory).
 
-On 10 Dec 2014, stefan@agner.ch wrote:
+On 10 Dec 2014, stefan at agner.ch wrote:
 
 > What I currently did, is just accept strength / 2 bits. This is not a
 > clean solution since it will also count the ECC bits, but it works for
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 4759dd9..c63ac47 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,29 +6,25 @@
  "ref\0c444059de888a661fadf3d6be598a98d@agner.ch\0"
  "ref\087lhphyjkg.fsf@nbsps.com\0"
  "ref\00bc8cec13bcf5b9cbea9cd3345815e4a@agner.ch\0"
- "From\0Bill Pringlemeir <bpringlemeir@nbsps.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [RFC 2/5] mtd:fsl_nfc: Add hardware 45 byte BHC-ECC support for 24 bit corrections.\0"
+ "From\0bpringlemeir@nbsps.com (Bill Pringlemeir)\0"
+ "Subject\0[RFC 2/5] mtd:fsl_nfc: Add hardware 45 byte BHC-ECC support for 24 bit corrections.\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:44:30 -0500\0"
- "To\0Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>\0"
- "Cc\0b21989@freescale.com"
-  linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
-  Jason.jin@freescale.com
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "\n"
- ">>>> On 17 Sep 2014, stefan@agner.ch wrote:\n"
+ ">>>> On 17 Sep 2014, stefan at agner.ch wrote:\n"
  "\n"
  ">>> Yes, we are using Macronix SLC NAND.\n"
  "\n"
- ">>>> On 17 Sep 2014, stefan@agner.ch wrote:\n"
+ ">>>> On 17 Sep 2014, stefan at agner.ch wrote:\n"
  "\n"
  ">>> This is a new device, but its one out of several dozens. The device\n"
  ">>> had two factory marked bad page. This four page would then be 6 bad\n"
  ">>> pages. I would say that your guess is probably the case at hand\n"
  ">>> (should be considered bad, but were marked by factory).\n"
  "\n"
- "On 10 Dec 2014, stefan@agner.ch wrote:\n"
+ "On 10 Dec 2014, stefan at agner.ch wrote:\n"
  "\n"
  "> What I currently did, is just accept strength / 2 bits. This is not a\n"
  "> clean solution since it will also count the ECC bits, but it works for\n"
@@ -99,4 +95,4 @@
  "fwiw,\n"
  Bill.
 
-9a91f04641f3527e62a27bc2188665b8fb56376b46fe3a2808b3f0b4954b38f4
+9013a99b743bdac79093832ce6bafd0488eb7102a9198ccf65dbf939fee28af5

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.