From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:12:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761kfuwa5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>>
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Aneesh, can you test this series?
Sorry for the late reply. I will test this and update here.
-aneesh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:30:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761kfuwa5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>>
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Aneesh, can you test this series?
Sorry for the late reply. I will test this and update here.
-aneesh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Aneesh Kumar K.V)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:30:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761kfuwa5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>>
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Aneesh, can you test this series?
Sorry for the late reply. I will test this and update here.
-aneesh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:30:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761kfuwa5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>>
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Aneesh, can you test this series?
Sorry for the late reply. I will test this and update here.
-aneesh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:30:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761kfuwa5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>>
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Aneesh, can you test this series?
Sorry for the late reply. I will test this and update here.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-05 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 1:11 [RFC PATCH 0/3] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management functionality Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 6:56 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 6:56 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 6:56 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 6:56 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 6:56 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 6:56 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-10 2:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 2:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 2:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 2:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 2:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-05 17:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:51 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-10 2:57 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 3:01 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 3:01 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 3:01 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 3:01 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] DMA, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 7:00 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:00 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:00 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:00 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:00 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:00 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-10 2:49 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 2:49 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 2:49 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 2:49 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 2:49 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-11 8:24 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-11 8:24 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-11 8:24 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-11 8:24 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-11 8:24 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 1:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, " Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03 7:02 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:02 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:02 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:02 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:02 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 7:02 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03 9:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-03 9:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-03 9:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-03 9:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-03 9:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 17:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2014-06-05 17:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8761kfuwa5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.