From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: Make the git codebase thread-safe Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:38:50 +0100 Message-ID: <8761oj8l0l.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <52FBC9E5.6010609@gmail.com> <52FC820F.3030707@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Stefan Zager , Karsten Blees , kusmabite@gmail.com, Stefan Zager , GIT Mailing-list To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 13 09:39:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDrpQ-0006Vx-Me for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:39:29 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753065AbaBMIjZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:39:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:41811 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752119AbaBMIjY (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:39:24 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40850 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDrpL-0006Tb-04; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:39:23 -0500 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8FCB3E047C; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:38:50 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <52FC820F.3030707@viscovery.net> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:27:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > Am 2/12/2014 20:30, schrieb Stefan Zager: >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Karsten Blees wrote: >>> Am 12.02.2014 19:37, schrieb Erik Faye-Lund: >>>> ReOpenFile, that's fantastic. Thanks a lot! >>> >>> ...but should be loaded dynamically via GetProcAddress, or are we >>> ready to drop XP support? >> >> Right, that is an issue. From our perspective, it's well past time to >> drop XP support. > > Not from mine. XP has not even reached end of life yet. As a point of comparison, there are tensions on the Emacs developer list several times a decade because some people suggest it might be time to drop the MSDOS port and/or the associated restriction of having filenames be unique in the 8+3 naming scheme. -- David Kastrup