All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
To: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>, <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lookup_object: split up displacement penalty for hash collisions
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:26:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761v6dm0r.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87haeqdop3.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> (Thomas Rast's message of "Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:28:40 +0200")

Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> writes:

> Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> However please do check if this patch brings the promised performance
>> on your own, as you're likely using different hardware and another
>> software setup. Feel free to share your performance differences.
>
> I get this on an i7-M620 laptop from t/perf/p0001-rev-list.sh:
>
>   Test                               HEAD                next                    
>   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   0001.1: rev-list --all             6.29(6.03+0.22)     6.33(6.06+0.24) +0.6%   
>   0001.2: rev-list --all --objects   53.22(52.48+0.54)   54.90(54.15+0.55) +3.2%*
>   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Significance hints:  '.' 0.1  '*' 0.05  '**' 0.01  '***' 0.001
[...]
> I trust the laptop numbers less because it has far more thermal (and
> thus throttling) issues, but the runs do show a significant difference,
> though less than you claimed.

Well, as I feared... another run on the same laptop:

Test                               HEAD                next                                            
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0001.1: rev-list --all             6.41(6.14+0.24)     6.36(6.10+0.23) -0.9%* 
0001.2: rev-list --all --objects   54.60(53.84+0.55)   54.23(53.50+0.53) -0.7%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Significance hints:  '.' 0.1  '*' 0.05  '**' 0.01  '***' 0.001

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-16  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-15 19:35 [PATCH] lookup_object: split up displacement penalty for hash collisions Stefan Beller
2013-08-16  8:28 ` Thomas Rast
2013-08-16  9:26   ` Thomas Rast [this message]
2013-08-16  9:41     ` Stefan Beller
2013-08-16  9:57     ` Jeff King
2013-08-16 13:49       ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8761v6dm0r.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net \
    --to=trast@inf.ethz.ch \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=stefanbeller@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.