From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"open list:MULTIMEDIA CARD (...),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)"
<linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix runtime suspend crash: add host checks in callbacks
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:57:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87629vkywt.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANfBPZ8i-N-0=GMk5OZ+oLipCv3fihHd3N1gYp_F94PE5LM5rg@mail.gmail.com> (Venkatraman S.'s message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:17:45 +0530")
"S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>> "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Due to the way the driver core takes runtime PM references during
>>>> probe, a driver's runtime PM callbacks may not be called until probe
>>>> returns. During probe, drvdata is set to the 'host' pointer but if
>>>> probe fails, drvdata is set to NULL.
>>>>
>>>> The runtime PM callbacks currently blindly dereference this host
>>>> pointer, but if probe fails, and the runtime PM callbacks are called
>>>> after probe returns, a NULL pointer dereference will result.
>>>>
>>> Pardon my ignorance, but why would runtime suspend be called for a
>>> device whose probe has failed ? AFAIK, MMC stack wouldn't make the
>>> _enable()/disable() calls, which call runtime PM APIs, unless the
>>> probe is successful. Is there a stacktrace for the offending caller ?
>>
>> First thing to note: there are several error conditions *after*
>> pm_runtime_enable() and the first _get_sync() are called.
>>
>> So here's what can happen:
>>
>> The driver core does a _get_noresume() before calling the driver's
>> probe, so the runtime PM usecount is already 1 when the driver is
>> called. The _get_sync() in _probe enables the device and increases the
>> usecount to 2. The _put_sync() at the end of ->probe() will decrease
>> the usecount to 1, but since the usecount is still non-zero, the
>> driver's callbacks are still not called. It's not until the driver core
>> does its _put_sync (to balance the _get_noresume() that the usecount
>> goes to zero and the driver's callbacks are called.
>>
> Thanks for the detailed explanation.
> But pm_runtime_disable() is called in the error path, so shouldn't
> it prevent the driver callbacks from being called ?
Yes, you're right.
I'm getting a few different problems mixed together here. To work on a
different problem, I had commented out the pm_runtime_disable() call in
the error path and so I was seeing the callbacks being called even on
probe failure. Withe the pm_runtime_disable() added back, that doesn't
happen.
However, there is another case where the runtime PM callbacks may be
called: the PM domain code in omap_device can still attempts to call the
runtime PM callbacks during late suspend for devices that are not
already runtime suspended. This is done even when there is no driver
bound to a device, but this is a bug in the omap_device code, not in the
MMC driver. So I'll be sending a patch shortly to fix that.
So, all that to say, this patch can be dropped.
Thanks for the detailed review.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1341620786-13598-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-10 4:25 ` [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix runtime suspend crash: add host checks in callbacks S, Venkatraman
2012-07-10 14:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-07-10 14:47 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-10 22:57 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87629vkywt.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.