From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Adding Git to Better SCM Initiative : Comparison
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:36:06 +0100
Message-ID: <8763z6mujd.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <200712101357.49325.jnareb@gmail.com>
	<87ve76mwos.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0712101522290.27959@racer.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 10 16:36:43 2007
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1J1kgR-0007UW-OM
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:36:40 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751880AbXLJPgM (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:36:12 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751842AbXLJPgL
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:36:11 -0500
Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:4100 "EHLO mail.enyo.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751769AbXLJPgK (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:36:10 -0500
Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de)
	by mail.enyo.de with esmtp id 1J1kfw-0005DQ-Bp; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:36:08 +0100
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.68)
	(envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>)
	id 1J1kfu-0004CO-IC; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:36:06 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712101522290.27959@racer.site> (Johannes
	Schindelin's message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:23:23 +0000 (GMT)")
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/67723>

* Johannes Schindelin:

>> > +                <s id="git">
>> > +                    Yes (or no depending on interpretation). Git
>> 
>> This should be "No." (same for copies below).
>
> Nice.  I have no idea what you are talking about, as you only quoted the 
> answer, but not the question. 

Oops.  It's about the rename/copy detection stuff.

> (Same for the other quoted text.)

I tried to provide more context in those cases; the @@ lines should be
sufficient, I guess.