From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: Daily Xen Builds Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:36:05 -0700 Message-ID: <8764s2edei.fsf@us.ibm.com> References: <1129142873.5982.12.camel@dbarrera_tp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1129142873.5982.12.camel@dbarrera_tp> (David F. Barrera's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:47:53 -0500") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: David F Barrera Cc: Xen Developers List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Just a comment about these results: > Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL | > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+ > FC3pae | 78 | 10 | 0 | 1 | > hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 55 | 33 | 0 | 1 | > hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 | 66 | 20 | 0 | 1 | > hs20.fc4_x86_64 | 56 | 32 | 0 | 1 | > x235sles9nonpae | 77 | 9 | 0 | 1 | > x305rh4pae | 76 | 11 | 0 | 1 | > x305sles9nonpae | 53 | 32 | 0 | 1 | > x335fc4pae | 64 | 24 | 0 | 1 | The above list of PASS/FAIL results was generated with an old version of xm-test because I forgot to update the link that David pulls from last night. In tomorrow's report, we should see fewer failures, and most marked as expected. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com