From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: PAE status
Date: 25 May 2005 11:42:12 +0200
Message-ID: <8764x7abgr.fsf@bytesex.org>
References: <20050524134700.GA9962@bytesex>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050524134700.GA9962@bytesex>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Gerd Knorr <kraxel@suse.de> writes:

> known issues:
>  * Using memory above 4 GB is completely untested.  I wouldn't
>    be surprised if I missed some places which need fixing for
>    36-bit physical addresses ...
>  * The patches break the x86_64 build.

Found a bug while cleaning up stuff a bit to make it build again on
x86_64.  To fix that I need 64bit support for i386 in cmpxchg(), can
someone (Keir?) please add this?

thanks,

  Gerd