From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias DiPasquale Subject: Re: QUEUE target and IPT_CONTINUE verdict ? Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 18:12:13 -0400 Message-ID: <876ef97a05051515127fbbf066@mail.gmail.com> References: <200505131729.39430.laurent.guyon@adelux.fr> <876ef97a05051510053c6827c2@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Tobias DiPasquale Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Laurent Guyon , nf-devel Return-path: To: Henrik Nordstrom In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 5/15/05, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > -j QUEUE >=20 > makes iptables return the IPT_QUEUE verdict to the netfilter kernel, whic= h > then sends this to the queue handler (normally ip_queue with it's netlink > socket). On reinject netfilter continues on the next hook handler of the > same hook, or returns the packet to the kernel if there is no more > handlers on this hook. Is this also the reason that there can be only one ip_queue handler at a ti= me? --=20 [ Tobias DiPasquale ] 0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d