From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias DiPasquale Subject: Re: QUEUE target and IPT_CONTINUE verdict ? Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 07:03:01 -0400 Message-ID: <876ef97a05051604033d6e8bbb@mail.gmail.com> References: <200505131729.39430.laurent.guyon@adelux.fr> <876ef97a05051510053c6827c2@mail.gmail.com> <876ef97a05051515127fbbf066@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Tobias DiPasquale Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: nf-devel Return-path: To: Henrik Nordstrom In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 5/16/05, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > Why do you want more than one ip_queue handler, and how? I don't. I had just wondered as to the reason there was only one ip_queue handler allowed and when you explained the above, I figured that was the reason. Multiplexing ip_queue in userspace over multiple handlers is trivial; I don't see the need for more than one handler, given the complexity that it would add to the kernel to implement such. --=20 [ Tobias DiPasquale ] 0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d