From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias DiPasquale Subject: Re: CLUSTERIP and ProxyARP? Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:50:28 -0400 Message-ID: <876ef97a050627035063f5d929@mail.gmail.com> References: <876ef97a0506231536656b269b@mail.gmail.com> <20050627090959.GE19928@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Reply-To: Tobias DiPasquale Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: To: Harald Welte , nf-devel In-Reply-To: <20050627090959.GE19928@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 6/27/05, Harald Welte wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 06:36:08PM -0400, Tobias DiPasquale wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Does anyone know if ipt_CLUSTERIP and ProxyARP will work correctly > > together on a current Linux kernel? Anything special to watch out for? > > TIA :) >=20 > 1. all current linux kernel up to (and including 2.6.12) has a CLUSTERIP = bug > anyway What bug? Was it mentioned on this list earlier? I don't remember seeing it= ... > 2. I didn't think about interoperability with proxyarp when > implementing CLUSTERIP. In fact, CLUSTERIP is meant to run on > end-hosts (Such as webservers), not on gateways. >=20 > CLUSTERIP mangles ARP requests (and replies) from/to the CLUSTER IP > address. So if you are proxy-ARP'ing for different IP addresses, it > _should_ work. I'm going to test it out today. I will let the list know the results. Thank= s. --=20 [ Tobias DiPasquale ] 0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d