All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>, Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: lkmm@lists.linux.dev, joelagnelf@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
	paulmck@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
	ulfh@kernel.org, yury.norov@gmail.com, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] smp: Use release stores for csd_lock_record() state
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 21:20:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877bnlhzwc.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aj6stbjxAfjMaCUm@shell.ilvokhin.com>

On Fri, Jun 26 2026 at 16:45, Dmitry Ilvokhin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 05:30:21PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote:
>> > Since v2 is specifically about documenting the pairing, it would be good
>> > to make it symmetric and add the comment on the acquire side in
>> > csd_lock_wait_toolong().
>> > 
>> 
>> Its already documented [1]
>> 
>> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.1/source/kernel/smp.c#L275

Can you please avoid these silly links to a random source tree and just
tell people kernel/smp.c line 275?

> It is documented to some extent, but it doesn't explicitly state which
> smp_store_release() the smp_load_acquire() pairs with. I think that's
> the main benefit of these comments: making the synchronization pair
> explicit so readers don't have to infer it.

It's mandatory according to Documentation:

    "Certain things should always be commented.  Uses of memory barriers should
     be accompanied by a line explaining why the barrier is necessary"

which means it needs to be at the place where the barrier is used and
that implies an explanation for the pairing. It's a pain having to do
detective work to figure it out.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-22 16:38 [PATCH v2] smp: Use release stores for csd_lock_record() state Usama Arif
2026-06-24 14:15 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-06-24 15:27   ` Usama Arif
2026-06-25 14:42 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-26 16:30   ` Usama Arif
2026-06-26 16:45     ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-26 19:20       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-06-26 19:25 ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877bnlhzwc.ffs@fw13 \
    --to=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.