From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: mr-083 <matthieu@minio.io>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
its@irrelevant.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, berrange@redhat.com,
mr-083 <matthieu@min.io>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add blockdev-attach QMP command
Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 08:10:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877bphf4qg.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423162927.GA529033@fedora> (Stefan Hajnoczi's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:29:27 -0400")
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 07:39:05PM +0200, mr-083 wrote:
>> Add a blockdev-attach QMP command that attaches a block driver state
>> tree to a device's block backend. Unlike blockdev-insert-medium, this
>> works for non-removable devices such as NVMe namespaces.
>>
>> After drive_del removes a device's backing store, the BlockBackend
>> remains attached to the guest device but has no BlockDriverState.
>> blockdev-attach reconnects a block node (previously created with
>> blockdev-add) to the device's BlockBackend via blk_insert_bs().
>>
>> This separates the two concerns as recommended: blockdev-add creates
>> the block node, blockdev-attach associates it with the device.
>>
>> Example usage with NVMe namespace hot-swap:
>> drive_del drv0
>> blockdev-add node-name=node0 driver=qcow2 file.driver=file \
>> file.filename=disk.qcow2
>> blockdev-attach id=ns0 node-name=node0
>
> Hi Matthieu,
> I came across a quirk here:
>
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 \
> --blockdev file,filename=my-lun.img,node-name=drive1 \
> --device nvme,serial=nvme0 \
> --device nvme-ns,id=nvme-ns0,drive=drive1
> (qemu) drive_del drive1
> Error: drive drive1 is in use
I see "Error: Node drive1 is in use".
It's from qmp_blockdev_del():
bs = bdrv_find_node(node_name);
if (!bs) {
error_setg(errp, "Failed to find node with node-name='%s'", node_name);
return;
}
if (bdrv_has_blk(bs)) {
error_setg(errp, "Node %s is in use", node_name);
return;
}
Called from hmp_drive_del():
bs = bdrv_find_node(id);
if (bs) {
qmp_blockdev_del(id, &err);
goto unlock;
}
> But when I change --blockdev to --drive, it succeeds. I think this
> second scenario is the one that you have been testing.
I *guess* you changed it to something like
-drive if=none,file=test.img,id=drive1
hmp_drive_del()'s call of bdrv_find_node() then fails, and we take a
completely different path, which succeeds:
(qemu) info block
drive1 (#block195): test.img (raw)
Attached to: nvme-ns0
Cache mode: writeback
(qemu) drive_del drive1
(qemu) info block
nvme-ns0: [not inserted]
Attached to: nvme-ns0
This rips nvme-ns0's drive right off. Feels *unsafe*: the frontend
(here: nvme-ns) may reasonably assume that a non-removable medium stays
put, use it without checking it's still there, and crash.
> I also tried the QMP blockdev-del command together with --blockdev, and
> it fails:
>
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 ... \
> -qmp unix:/tmp/qmp.sock,server=on,wait=off
> $ qmp-shell /tmp/qmp.sock
> (QEMU) blockdev-del node-name=drive1
> {"error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "Node drive1 is in use"}}
>
> It seems logical that a disk image that's in use by NVMe emulation
> cannot be removed. So now I'm wondering if there is a bug or a
> historical reason why drive_del allows drives to the removed at runtime
> even when media change is not supported.
>
> CCing Kevin Wolf and Markus Amrbruster as they may know the answer.
I suspect this is simply a bug, and likely a regression. Can you find
out?
> Depending on the answer this may influence the test workflow in this
> patch. It's unclear to me what is being tested here since this does not
> simulate a real error that a physical NVMe drive could raise?
>
> I think the intention is to fail I/O so a test can simulate a period
> where the drive is down. QEMU has the blkdebug driver which could be
> inserted into the block graph to fail I/O requests - maybe that is
> appropriate for your test and may not require new monitor commands (see
> blkdebug examples in tests/)?
>
> Stefan
>
>>
>> An HMP wrapper is included for convenience.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu <matthieu@min.io>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 17:39 [PATCH] block: add blockdev-attach QMP command mr-083
2026-04-23 16:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-05-06 6:10 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2026-05-06 15:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-04-24 17:06 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877bphf4qg.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=matthieu@min.io \
--cc=matthieu@minio.io \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.