From: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
To: Mykyta Poturai <Mykyta_Poturai@epam.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>,
Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] arm/irq: Keep track of irq affinities
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 01:34:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877br8k3fy.fsf@epam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <733d58a26766a1d15e47447ed4f3cd299dc28cf7.1773307749.git.mykyta_poturai@epam.com> (Mykyta Poturai's message of "Thu, 12 Mar 2026 09:39:29 +0000")
Hi Mykyta,
Mykyta Poturai <Mykyta_Poturai@epam.com> writes:
> Currently on Arm the desc->affinity mask of an irq is never updated,
> which makes it hard to know the actual affinity of an interrupt.
With this change you'll track affinity of hardware interrupts, but pure
virtual interrupts still will not be tracked. Is it intended behaviour?
I believe it should be mentioned in the commit message.
>
> Fix this by updating the field in irq_set_affinity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mykyta Poturai <mykyta_poturai@epam.com>
>
> ---
> v5->v6:
> * add missing locking around irq_set_affinity calls
>
> v4->v5:
> * add locking
>
> v3->v4:
> * patch introduced
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c | 2 ++
> xen/arch/arm/irq.c | 9 +++++++--
> xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c | 11 +++++------
> xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
> index ea48c5375a..5253caf002 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,9 @@ static void gic_update_one_lr(struct vcpu *v, int i)
> if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) )
> {
> struct vcpu *v_target = vgic_get_target_vcpu(v, irq);
> + spin_lock(&p->desc->lock);
> irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(v_target->processor));
> + spin_unlock(&p->desc->lock);
> clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> index 73e58a5108..7204bc2b68 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> @@ -216,10 +216,15 @@ static inline struct domain *irq_get_domain(struct irq_desc *desc)
> return irq_get_guest_info(desc)->d;
> }
>
> +/* Must be called with desc->lock held */
> void irq_set_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *mask)
> {
> - if ( desc != NULL )
> - desc->handler->set_affinity(desc, mask);
> + if ( desc == NULL )
> + return;
> +
> + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&desc->lock));
> + cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, mask);
> + desc->handler->set_affinity(desc, mask);
> }
>
> int request_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int irqflags,
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> index 6647071ad4..c59f6873db 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -445,7 +445,9 @@ bool vgic_migrate_irq(struct vcpu *old, struct vcpu *new, unsigned int irq)
>
> if ( list_empty(&p->inflight) )
> {
> + spin_lock(&p->desc->lock);
> irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(new->processor));
> + spin_unlock(&p->desc->lock);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
> return true;
> }
> @@ -453,7 +455,9 @@ bool vgic_migrate_irq(struct vcpu *old, struct vcpu *new, unsigned int irq)
> if ( !list_empty(&p->lr_queue) )
> {
> vgic_remove_irq_from_queues(old, p);
> + spin_lock(&p->desc->lock);
> irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(new->processor));
> + spin_unlock(&p->desc->lock);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
> vgic_inject_irq(new->domain, new, irq, true);
> return true;
> @@ -473,6 +477,7 @@ void arch_move_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
> struct domain *d = v->domain;
> struct pending_irq *p;
> struct vcpu *v_target;
> + unsigned long flags;
> int i;
>
> /*
> @@ -494,7 +499,13 @@ void arch_move_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
> p = irq_to_pending(v_target, virq);
>
> if ( v_target == v && !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) )
> + {
> + if ( !p->desc )
> + continue;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&p->desc->lock, flags);
> irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpu_mask);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->desc->lock, flags);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -574,8 +585,8 @@ void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, unsigned int n)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v_target->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
> if ( p->desc != NULL )
> {
> - irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(v_target->processor));
> spin_lock_irqsave(&p->desc->lock, flags);
> + irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(v_target->processor));
> /*
> * The irq cannot be a PPI, we only support delivery of SPIs
> * to guests.
> @@ -944,4 +955,3 @@ void vgic_check_inflight_irqs_pending(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int rank, uint32_
> * indent-tabs-mode: nil
> * End:
> */
> -
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> index b7c2d7ce99..fc04741ca1 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> @@ -159,24 +159,23 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_target(struct vcpu *vcpu,
> for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ )
> {
> struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->domain, NULL, intid + i);
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq->hwintid);
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> irq->targets = (val >> (i * 8)) & cpu_mask;
> if ( irq->targets )
> {
> irq->target_vcpu = vcpu->domain->vcpu[ffs(irq->targets) - 1];
> if ( irq->hw )
> - {
> - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq->hwintid);
> -
> irq_set_affinity(desc, cpumask_of(irq->target_vcpu->processor));
> - }
> }
> else
> irq->target_vcpu = NULL;
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->domain, irq);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index b2c0e1873a..81ba4099ef 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -812,21 +812,22 @@ void arch_move_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
> {
> struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(d, NULL, i + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
> unsigned long flags;
> + irq_desc_t *desc;
>
> if ( !irq )
> continue;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq->hwintid);
>
> - /* Only hardware mapped vIRQs that are targeting this vCPU. */
> - if ( irq->hw && irq->target_vcpu == v)
> - {
> - irq_desc_t *desc = irq_to_desc(irq->hwintid);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> + /* Only hardware mapped vIRQs that are targeting this vCPU. */
> + if ( irq->hw && irq->target_vcpu == v )
> irq_set_affinity(desc, cpumask_of(v->processor));
> - }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> vgic_put_irq(d, irq);
> }
> }
--
WBR, Volodymyr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 9:39 [PATCH v6 0/5] Implement CPU hotplug on Arm Mykyta Poturai
2026-03-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] arm/irq: Keep track of irq affinities Mykyta Poturai
2026-03-18 8:05 ` Bertrand Marquis
2026-03-19 1:34 ` Volodymyr Babchuk [this message]
2026-03-19 1:39 ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2026-03-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] arm/irq: Migrate IRQs during CPU up/down operations Mykyta Poturai
2026-03-18 8:12 ` Bertrand Marquis
2026-03-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] arm/sysctl: Implement cpu hotplug ops Mykyta Poturai
2026-03-18 8:23 ` Bertrand Marquis
2026-03-23 11:09 ` Jan Beulich
2026-03-27 10:39 ` Mykyta Poturai
2026-03-27 11:40 ` Jan Beulich
2026-03-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] tools: Allow building xen-hptool without CONFIG_MIGRATE Mykyta Poturai
2026-03-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] docs: Document CPU hotplug Mykyta Poturai
2026-03-18 8:28 ` Bertrand Marquis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877br8k3fy.fsf@epam.com \
--to=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=Mykyta_Poturai@epam.com \
--cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.