From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81FCB1EBFE3; Wed, 7 May 2025 18:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746641079; cv=none; b=ZJLwgKj1R+VvJfzUuDRVyNjiLlwrr/uKP+oZGBCLQUIvxRjkc9W5H02hAyyVResQA9K02gxd9zbcj1wubfjEBuDQ2cy4KkE1QErcMd0GaVcjk88MshiuSmiXBGgoiE+0z0G7NiBinG2VNFeBPqcMzv7cmjbAILsRiIn3ey3Bd8k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746641079; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jUM/HI0JujTGfaxkNUSzcimDqWgqa+5yCds1nP1XrmQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O2az4jaQJK0vh89E5QSs5KHRKVqzHpgE8XkFfOOXfBF+/GhxjSd9Y7uNQLfVaIwQsNTEUNhhloOuritdHTUfelxcdTyu2d3Rng43uy2sKMrQbuJAKsZXC77gyBuAuGt8ogDnYYQjOH+lGvlui8TW0zo9friQXwI0k0XHp5UHydU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hAg0hnAI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hAg0hnAI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8A23C4CEE9; Wed, 7 May 2025 18:04:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746641079; bh=jUM/HI0JujTGfaxkNUSzcimDqWgqa+5yCds1nP1XrmQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hAg0hnAIkhGUhL0Z7d8mybAofEjqzZ6IXjksgIRmT+AWrwapb1zDV+WPNUeNd/7hQ ZBKZTeEKp37J7N5T4drjN9Y5DO4gFpJEAUugFIEJmg6KUNb37jJ9OK2a+8uprLuBsZ ebD+GPKU+MiXRBHC6E40zQkifSb0StDgv2hIFRPNJOWik0fYvP9f5HpWP4ibP6wsRZ PxX/2PhyQS0M7+RYag5cjexzJ3AGRbW5r0Dlz2eN+1Fb7HZt50teMn7taodi+5BNAy /Npy0vJdMf5zhVZC0W/7FlNrZh1jIbBS0fD86s4twSwgOseoz/BdLsRytBFPQYU0hh /DEF8UcBHLU7A== From: Andreas Hindborg To: "Ingo Molnar" Cc: , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Frederic Weisbecker" , "H . Peter Anvin" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Alex Gaynor" , "Anna-Maria Behnsen" , "Boqun Feng" , "Lyude Paul" , "Rust ML" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] rust: Rename timer_container_of() to hrtimer_container_of() In-Reply-To: <20250507175338.672442-2-mingo@kernel.org> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Wed, 07 May 2025 19:53:29 +0200") References: <20250507175338.672442-1-mingo@kernel.org> <20250507175338.672442-2-mingo@kernel.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.1 Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 20:04:23 +0200 Message-ID: <877c2spaag.fsf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Ingo Molnar" writes: > This primitive is dealing with 'struct hrtimer' objects, not > 'struct timer_list' objects - so clarify the name. > > We want to introduce the timer_container_of() symbol in the kernel > for timer_list, make sure there's no clash of namespaces, at least > on the conceptual plane. Is this a resend? Again, I think this change is unnecessary. Please see my earlier reply [1]. Best regards, Andreas Hindborg [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/877c3cbdq2.fsf@kernel.org