From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8425C36017 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE4810E664; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AhQQ9wbT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D06410E664 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:42:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1743536561; x=1775072561; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=pQxv5Dt51GqwzaRvw88SWAtlH92vzbXWDPb6VUXwIJM=; b=AhQQ9wbTob9rwp0MoumlT8wl5ZBGYukBFsOpQwcd1vD203Eutre4p53p 1pSWWfQvupkFN5iVB48rCmvTOyqMCdit/hAwKhY+eDUuW6VMyePMztdov 7yiXtWNUJAp6VEoa6+2HFtb0k3e7yynhbGjcQD+3YTCCIn9aByUKyb7lI CGcfwZWnCOX54ZZ45i0TjWJ13a2BN9mwiN0bJLLyn+7LB+o9iwnfpl1Ne O6weNY3U7X+nyMZWOFChZB7icHFnC4M87nZYURNYylSbQqqTqzjO+jTBk 3i4Z4W5Ap4t/yA/AoJzBdNXZiFRgyvOTSkWcAk2e5hF+NhDWhjaY+gEBB A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WzWQU0JxT5iX5gmbLk5UDg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: V/6eK6OwSkWrmiK9oByHMQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11391"; a="55538376" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,294,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="55538376" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Apr 2025 12:42:41 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TMKqicpOQbePKXBHOY1KMQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: qf68Du+PRm29D1/ggkQhQA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,294,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="157421072" Received: from ncintean-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.7]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Apr 2025 12:42:38 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Jason Gunthorpe , Masahiro Yamada Cc: Linus Torvalds , Dave Airlie , dri-devel , LKML Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.15-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20250401191455.GC325917@nvidia.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <87h6394i87.fsf@intel.com> <20250331133137.GA263675@nvidia.com> <87tt782htn.fsf@intel.com> <20250401191455.GC325917@nvidia.com> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 22:42:35 +0300 Message-ID: <877c433bys.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Tue, 01 Apr 2025, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > So, I'd suggest a better way to run this is first build the kernel, > then mine the gcc -MD output (ie stored in the .XX.cmd files) to > generate a list of headers that are actually part of the build, then > only test those. That eliminates all the kconfig problems. Opt out any > special headers that really have a good reason not to be stand alone. I think we'd want the drm headers pass the checks independent of configs (apart from CONFIG_DRM). One size doesn't fit all. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel