From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915: s/intel_crtc_bw/intel_dbuf_bw/
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:57:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877c4a7vom.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250326162544.3642-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Rename the intel_crtc_bw struct to intel_dbuf_bw to better
> reflect what it does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index 15c2377193f7..b34db55f5a7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -1157,15 +1157,15 @@ static bool intel_bw_state_changed(struct intel_display *display,
> enum pipe pipe;
>
> for_each_pipe(display, pipe) {
> - const struct intel_dbuf_bw *old_crtc_bw =
> + const struct intel_dbuf_bw *old_dbuf_bw =
> &old_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> - const struct intel_dbuf_bw *new_crtc_bw =
> + const struct intel_dbuf_bw *new_dbuf_bw =
> &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> enum dbuf_slice slice;
>
> for_each_dbuf_slice(display, slice) {
> - if (old_crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] != new_crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] ||
> - old_crtc_bw->active_planes[slice] != new_crtc_bw->active_planes[slice])
> + if (old_dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice] != new_dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice] ||
> + old_dbuf_bw->active_planes[slice] != new_dbuf_bw->active_planes[slice])
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ static void skl_plane_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> - struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> + struct intel_dbuf_bw *dbuf_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> unsigned int dbuf_mask = skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(i915, ddb);
> enum dbuf_slice slice;
>
> @@ -1194,8 +1194,8 @@ static void skl_plane_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> * equal share of the total bw to each plane.
> */
> for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(display, slice, dbuf_mask) {
> - crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] = max(crtc_bw->max_bw[slice], data_rate);
> - crtc_bw->active_planes[slice] |= BIT(plane_id);
> + dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice] = max(dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice], data_rate);
> + dbuf_bw->active_planes[slice] |= BIT(plane_id);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1204,10 +1204,10 @@ static void skl_crtc_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> - struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> + struct intel_dbuf_bw *dbuf_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> enum plane_id plane_id;
>
> - memset(crtc_bw, 0, sizeof(*crtc_bw));
> + memset(dbuf_bw, 0, sizeof(*dbuf_bw));
>
> if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
> return;
> @@ -1249,10 +1249,10 @@ intel_bw_dbuf_min_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
> * equal share of the total bw to each plane.
> */
> for_each_pipe(display, pipe) {
> - const struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> + const struct intel_dbuf_bw *dbuf_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
>
> - max_bw = max(crtc_bw->max_bw[slice], max_bw);
> - num_active_planes += hweight8(crtc_bw->active_planes[slice]);
> + max_bw = max(dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice], max_bw);
> + num_active_planes += hweight8(dbuf_bw->active_planes[slice]);
> }
> max_bw *= num_active_planes;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-27 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-26 16:25 [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/i915: Drop the cached per-pipe min_cdclk[] from bw state Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 7:56 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915: s/intel_crtc_bw/intel_dbuf_bw/ Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 7:57 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_dbuf_bw_changed() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 7:57 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915: Pass intel_dbuf_bw to skl_*_calc_dbuf_bw() explicitly Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 7:57 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915: Avoid triggering unwanted cdclk changes due to dbuf bandwidth changes Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 8:00 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-27 12:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/i915: Do more bw readout Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/i915: Flag even inactive crtcs as "inherited" Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/i915: Drop force_check_qgv Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_modeset_checks() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_check_sagv_mask() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/i915: Make intel_bw_check_sagv_mask() internal to intel_bw.c Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/i915: Make intel_bw_modeset_checks() internal to intel_bw_atomic_check() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] drm/i915: Skip bw stuff if per-crtc sagv state doesn't change Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] drm/i915: Eliminate intel_compute_sagv_mask() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 17:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup (rev4) Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:45 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:45 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:50 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup (rev4) Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:03 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:07 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-03-27 8:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-27 11:46 ` Patchwork
2025-04-04 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup Jani Nikula
2025-04-04 18:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup (rev5) Patchwork
2025-04-04 18:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-04-04 18:30 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-04 21:37 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877c4a7vom.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.