From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_oa: Enable OA tests for simulation
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:01:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877c54t6is.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305005716.168646-3-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On Tue, 04 Mar 2025 16:57:16 -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> Simulation runs are slow, so account for that by modifying the scope of
> the tests.
>
> - Set parameters specific to simulation during init.
> - Skip tests that are heavily reliant on timing and that only test SW
> functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> index e5744d830d39..06d324159211 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> @@ -1111,13 +1111,25 @@ init_sys_info(void)
>
> intel_xe_perf_load_perf_configs(intel_xe_perf, drm_fd);
>
> - min_oa_exponent = 5;
> - max_oa_exponent = 20;
> - rc_width = 1920;
> - rc_height = 1080;
> - buffer_fill_size = SZ_16M;
> - num_buf_sizes = ARRAY_SIZE(buf_sizes);
> - oa_exponent_default = max_oa_exponent_for_period_lte(1000000);
> + if (igt_run_in_simulation()) {
> + igt_debug("SIMULATION run\n");
> + min_oa_exponent = 5;
> + max_oa_exponent = 10;
> + rc_width = 64;
> + rc_height = 36;
> + buffer_fill_size = SZ_128K;
> + num_buf_sizes = 3;
> + oa_exponent_default = max_oa_exponent_for_period_lte(1000);
> + } else {
> + igt_debug("HW run\n");
> + min_oa_exponent = 5;
> + max_oa_exponent = 20;
> + rc_width = 1920;
> + rc_height = 1080;
> + buffer_fill_size = SZ_16M;
> + num_buf_sizes = ARRAY_SIZE(buf_sizes);
> + oa_exponent_default = max_oa_exponent_for_period_lte(1000000);
> + }
Just a question here: what execution time (allowed by CI) are we assuming
for these simulation specific params?
>
> default_oa_buffer_size = get_default_oa_buffer_size(drm_fd);
> igt_debug("default_oa_buffer_size: %zu\n", default_oa_buffer_size);
> @@ -4758,6 +4770,7 @@ igt_main
> test_enable_disable(hwe);
>
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("blocking") {
> + igt_require(!igt_run_in_simulation());
> __for_one_hwe_in_oag(hwe)
> test_blocking(40 * 1000 * 1000 /* 40ms oa period */,
> false /* set_kernel_hrtimer */,
> @@ -4766,6 +4779,7 @@ igt_main
> }
>
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("polling") {
> + igt_require(!igt_run_in_simulation());
> __for_one_hwe_in_oag(hwe)
> test_polling(40 * 1000 * 1000 /* 40ms oa period */,
> false /* set_kernel_hrtimer */,
> @@ -4805,8 +4819,10 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest("oa-unit-exclusive-stream-exec-q")
> test_oa_unit_exclusive_stream(false);
>
> - igt_subtest("oa-unit-concurrent-oa-buffer-read")
> + igt_subtest("oa-unit-concurrent-oa-buffer-read") {
> + igt_require(!igt_run_in_simulation());
> test_oa_unit_concurrent_oa_buffer_read();
> + }
I am assuming all remaining tests either (a) pass in simulation, or, (b)
have legitimate failures there which need fixing. This is great news:
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> }
>
> igt_subtest("rc6-disable") {
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 0:57 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Modify some OA tests for simulation Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-05 0:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel/xe_oa: Do not discard single reports in oa-formats Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-05 4:56 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-03-05 16:27 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-05 0:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_oa: Enable OA tests for simulation Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-05 5:01 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-03-05 16:25 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-05 3:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure for Modify some " Patchwork
2025-03-05 16:17 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-05 3:44 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-05 16:17 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-05 4:25 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-03-05 16:16 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877c54t6is.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.