Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] tmpfs: Add casefold lookup support

[Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be>]

André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com> writes:

> Hey Krisman,
>
> Em 12/09/2024 16:04, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi escreveu:
>> André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com> writes:
>> 
>
> [...]
>
>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>>> +	if (ctx->encoding) {
>>> +		sb->s_encoding = ctx->encoding;
>>> +		sb->s_d_op = &shmem_ci_dentry_ops;
>>> +		if (ctx->strict_encoding)
>>> +			sb->s_encoding_flags = SB_ENC_STRICT_MODE_FL;
>>> +	}
>>>   #else
>>> -	sb->s_flags |= SB_NOUSER;
>>> +	sb->s_d_op = &simple_dentry_operations;
>> Moving simple_dentry_operations to be set at s_d_op should be a
>> separate
>> patch.
>> It is a change that has non-obvious side effects (i.e. the way we
>> treat the root dentry) so it needs proper review by itself.  It is
>> also not related to the rest of the case-insensitive patch.
>> 
>
> The idea of setting simple_dentry_operations come from my previous
> approach of having our own shmem_lookup(), replacing
> simple_lookup(). Now that we are settled to keep with simple_lookup()
> anyway (that already sets simple_dentry_operations), I think we don't
> need this change anymore, right?

Up to you, really. If you don't need it to support casefold lookup in
tmpfs, it doesn't need to be part of the same patchset.

> This will be set for every dentry that doesn't have a
> dentry->d_sb->s_d_op. Case-insensitive mount points will have this set,
> so we don't risk overwriting it.

I encourage you to send a new version with this.  makes sense to me.

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi