All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, maz@kernel.org,
	vincent.whitchurch@axis.com, iwtbavbm@gmail.com,
	158710936@qq.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Keep handle_nested_irq() from touching desc->threads_active
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:23:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cewwtbm.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240609183046.GA14050@iZj6chx1xj0e0buvshuecpZ>

On Mon, Jun 10 2024 at 02:30, Peng Liu wrote:
> handle_nested_irq() is supposed to be running inside the parent thread
> handler context. It per se has no dedicated kernel thread, thus shouldn't
> touch desc->threads_active. The parent kernel thread has already taken
> care of this.

No it has not. The parent thread has marked itself in the parent threads
interrupt descriptor.

How does that help synchronizing the nested interrupt, which has a
separate interrupt descriptor?

> Fixes: e2c12739ccf7 ("genirq: Prevent nested thread vs synchronize_hardirq() deadlock")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

There is nothing to fix.

> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Despite of its correctness, I'm afraid the testing on my only PC can't
> cover the affected code path. So the patch may be totally -UNTESTED-.

Which correctness?

The change log of the commit you want to "fix" says:

    Remove the incorrect usage in the nested threaded interrupt case and
    instead re-use the threads_active / wait_for_threads mechanism to
    wait for nested threaded interrupts to complete.

It's very clearly spelled out, no?

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-10 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-09 18:30 [PATCH] genirq: Keep handle_nested_irq() from touching desc->threads_active Peng Liu
2024-06-10 18:23 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-06-11 13:19   ` Peng Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877cewwtbm.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=158710936@qq.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iwtbavbm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.