All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
	<regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev, Laura Nao <laura.nao@collabora.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] mainline boot regression on AMD Stoney Ridge Chromebooks
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:01:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877chdb7tf.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09d67d1d-2c65-4872-b38e-665eda154339@leemhuis.info>

On Thu, Apr 04 2024 at 10:24, Linux regression tracking wrote:
> On 28.03.24 12:50, Laura Nao wrote:
>>>
>>> I ran a manual bisection to track down the root cause for this
>>> regression and landed on the c749ce
>>> commit from this series:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240212153625.145745053@linutronix.de/
>
> FWIW, that commit is c749ce393b8fe9 ("x86/cpu: Use common topology code
> for AMD") from tglx that was part of the "x86/cpu: Rework topology
> evaluation" series.
>
>>> Do you have any insight on this issue or any suggestion on how to
>>> effectively debug this?
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>
> Hmmm, it looks like this did not make any progress. Thomas, did this
> fall through the cracks due to Easter, or is this this on your todo
> list?
>
> Or was there some progress and I just missed it?

No. It's in my easter eggs basket, but I need to eat all the chocolate
eggs first to get to this.

I'll have a look later today.

Thanks,

        tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-22 17:52 [REGRESSION] mainline boot regression on AMD Stoney Ridge Chromebooks Laura Nao
2024-03-28  9:44 ` Laura Nao
2024-03-28 11:50   ` Laura Nao
2024-04-04  8:24     ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-04  9:26       ` Laura Nao
2024-04-04 13:01       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-04-04 13:05         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 15:23           ` Laura Nao
2024-04-04 16:14             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 18:06               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 19:14                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 20:05                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-05  8:14                     ` Laura Nao
2024-04-05  8:42                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-05 10:32                         ` Laura Nao
2024-04-05 13:38                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-05 13:58                             ` Laura Nao
2024-04-05 14:59                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08  8:20                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08 11:06                                   ` Laura Nao
2024-04-08 14:19                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-09 10:07                                       ` Laura Nao
2024-04-09 12:25                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10  8:15                                           ` Laura Nao
2024-04-10 13:57                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 16:11                                               ` Laura Nao
2024-04-10 19:34                                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 19:45                                                   ` [patch 0/2] x86/cpu/amd: Fixup the topology rework fallout Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 19:45                                                     ` [patch 1/2] x86/cpu/amd: Make the CPUID 0x80000008 parser correct Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 12:45                                                       ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 10:12                                                       ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 19:45                                                     ` [patch 2/2] x86/cpu/amd: Make the NODEID_MSR union actually work Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 12:45                                                       ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 10:12                                                       ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 11:27                                                     ` [patch 0/2] x86/cpu/amd: Fixup the topology rework fallout Laura Nao
2024-04-11 11:37                                                       ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-11 12:14                                                         ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877chdb7tf.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=laura.nao@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.