All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: lucas.demarchi@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/6] xe/display: clarify display configuration
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 13:14:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cnw6r2r.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1696588392.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Fri, 06 Oct 2023, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> v2 of [1] with all the controversial patches dropped.
>
> I'm not going to pursue the dropped patches any further. I'll leave it up to
> others to clean them up or leave them broken as they see fit.

Lucas, you claimed v1 broke LNL, but I have no way to verify. Does v2
work for you?

BR,
Jani.



>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/124561/
>
>
> Jani Nikula (6):
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   fixup! drm/xe: Introduce Xe assert macros
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>
>  .../gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h | 11 ++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_assert.h                |  3 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h          |  2 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c               | 25 ++++++++-----------
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-09 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-06 10:37 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/6] xe/display: clarify display configuration Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 10:37 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/6] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 10:37 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/6] " Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 10:37 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/6] " Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 10:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/6] fixup! drm/xe: Introduce Xe assert macros Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 10:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/6] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 10:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 6/6] " Jani Nikula
2023-10-09 10:14 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-10-11 12:17   ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/6] xe/display: clarify display configuration Jani Nikula
2023-10-09 11:17 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe/display: clarify display configuration (rev3) Patchwork
2023-10-09 11:18 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-10-09 11:19 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-10-09 11:26 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-10-09 11:27 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-10-09 11:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-10-09 12:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877cnw6r2r.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.