From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6FB422627 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 21:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9AB405FC for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 21:59:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 4C9AB405FC Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fsf.org header.i=@fsf.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail-fsf-org header.b=ZzkIiWC0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.402 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBg5GFyAwQgX for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 21:59:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org F33DA4049A Received: from mail.fsf.org (mail.fsf.org [209.51.188.13]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F33DA4049A for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 21:59:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsf.org; s=mail-fsf-org; h=MIME-Version:In-reply-to:Date:Subject:To:From:References; bh=l+LQgNrP0W/hcsPySOpCghthmgCGkeCcjeMnSDKhCqk=; b=ZzkIiWC0NEp+bHKDsb464qtD7 bFIQOBEpKaxgmqwNUSQi4ot79b7B6LyZnRmn9UyThgFp3Iuw2Zp/b+OWa30qKyJQgmbYjU+wlzBV7 3xUL7TndeaduFXnOT2DnLqDOLdpHnuvKxNd9Zo7EuCp0/LEt3Ur0uNmHfv5o4X44Adq9FvTxojsVG +KpaEAvPtp/zKwkqqYZw3XOKcqyOqKBKPZa81pPa7TPd5RySRaXgIwWV7q8F1AjhVC3veauAkEaBD cOeM9G4hykjP6f+eEE97qC5fpZ0h7Hg3tVxSSgKTKy6QVphMQkCC83lPRwya/yLuX2GjpbmVYHDO7 lyHSAxUrA==; References: <13b3266b-a410-77fd-5dfc-4e4994b630cd@redhat.com> <20230519-rebate-guru-b0528e@meerkat> <87wn108jqr.fsf@fsf.org> <3d664367-8be4-8910-380d-10076cc97762@redhat.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.9.0; emacs 29.0.50 From: Ian Kelling To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev , cti-tac@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Khahil White Subject: Re: Next steps from GTI TAC meeting on 2023-03-08 - Evaluate cost of glibc migration. Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 17:53:35 -0400 In-reply-to: <3d664367-8be4-8910-380d-10076cc97762@redhat.com> Message-ID: <877csx8k7g.fsf@fsf.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cti-tac@lists.linuxfoundation.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Carlos O'Donell writes: > On 5/22/23 10:37, Ian Kelling wrote: >> >> GNU already has a system for release uploads to https://ftp.gnu.org that >> works very well and I help maintain it. > > Agreed, and I use it for glibc to upload release tarballs. > > However, the tarball release process is quite heavy-weight for release branch maintenance. > > In addition the downstreams sync from git release branch -> distro git to get the > rolling release updates. > > So all the other discussions about trusting git become relevant here. Yes, that all makes sense to me. - Ian