Re: [PATCH for-5.19 1/2] irqchip/loongson-liointc: Use architecture register to get coreid

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On Sat, 04 Jun 2022 14:46:30 +0100,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 在 2022/6/4 14:18, Huacai Chen 写道:
> > Hi, Jiaxun,
> > 
> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 8:41 PM Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> wrote:
> >> fa84f89395e0 ("irqchip/loongson-liointc: Fix build error for
> >> LoongArch") replaced get_ebase_cpunum with physical processor
> >> id from SMP facilities. However that breaks MIPS non-SMP build
> >> and makes booting from other cores inpossible on non-SMP kernel.
> >> 
> >> Thus we revert get_ebase_cpunum back and use get_csr_cpuid for
> >> LoongArch.
> >> 
> >> Fixes: fa84f89395e0 ("irqchip/loongson-liointc: Fix build error for LoongArch")
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c | 10 +++++++++-
> >>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
> >> index aed88857d90f..c11cf97bcd1a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
> >> @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@
> >> 
> >>   #define LIOINTC_ERRATA_IRQ     10
> >> 
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MIPS)
> >> +#define liointc_core_id get_ebase_cpunum()
> >> +#elif defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
> >> +#define liointc_core_id get_csr_cpuid()
> >> +#else
> >> +#define liointc_core_id 0
> >> +#endif
> > Thank you for your quick fix. But I think it is better to do like this:
> > 
> > #if defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
> > #define liointc_core_id get_csr_cpuid()
> > #else
> > #define liointc_core_id get_ebase_cpunum()
> > #endif
> > 
> > Because this driver doesn't depend on COMPILE_TEST, it can only be
> > built under MIPS and LOONGARCH. Moreover, let the else branch be the
> > same as the old behavior looks more reasonable.
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> Will do for v2.

Any update on this? I believe MIPS is still broken.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.