From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>,
joostkremers@fastmail.fm
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stash: disable literal treatment when passing top pathspec
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2022 00:10:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d7y3nif.fsf@kyleam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa6cvmmzn.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:
[...]
>> * the 'git clean' call, triggered by --include-untracked, does not
>> remove untracked files from the working tree
>>
>> * the 'git checkout' call, triggered by --keep-index, fails with a
>> message about ":/" not matching any known files, and the main
>> command exits with a non-zero status
>>
>> Fix both of these spots by passing --no-literal-pathspecs to the
>> subprocess commands.
>
> Yuck (to the original problem, not to the proposed solution).
>
> I wonder if stopping to use ":/" (or using "." instead, if we need
> to give _some_ pathspec) is a better approach. Don't we move to the
> top of the working tree by the time cmd_stash() is called and whatever
> subprocess we spawn via run_command() interface will start at the
> top anyway, no?
For the --keep-index/checkout case, yes, it looks like the command
starts from the top-level. Passing "." as the pathspec to checkout
works fine, as far as I can tell.
However, for --include-untracked/clean case, the subprocess directory is
set to startup_info->original_cwd since 0fce211ccc (stash: do not
attempt to remove startup_info->original_cwd, 2021-12-09).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-09 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-08 3:12 [PATCH] stash: disable literal treatment when passing top pathspec Kyle Meyer
2022-04-08 6:33 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-04-08 8:46 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-08 18:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-08 18:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-09 4:10 ` Kyle Meyer [this message]
2022-04-11 17:55 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d7y3nif.fsf@kyleam.com \
--to=kyle@kyleam.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=joostkremers@fastmail.fm \
--cc=t.gummerer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.