From: "Alvin Šipraga" <ALSI@bang-olufsen.dk>
To: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"olteanv@gmail.com" <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"arinc.unal@arinc9.com" <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: dsa: tag_rtl8_4: add rtl8_4t trailing variant
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:46:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d9spfct.fsf@bang-olufsen.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220218060959.6631-2-luizluca@gmail.com> (Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca's message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2022 03:09:58 -0300")
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com> writes:
> The switch supports the same tag both before ethertype or before CRC.
s/The switch supports/Realtek switches support/?
I think you should update the documentation at the top of the file as
well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/dsa.h | 2 +
> net/dsa/tag_rtl8_4.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
> index fd1f62a6e0a8..b688ced04b0e 100644
> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct phylink_link_state;
> #define DSA_TAG_PROTO_BRCM_LEGACY_VALUE 22
> #define DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1110_VALUE 23
> #define DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4_VALUE 24
> +#define DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4T_VALUE 25
>
> enum dsa_tag_protocol {
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE = DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE_VALUE,
> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ enum dsa_tag_protocol {
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE_VALUE,
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1110 = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1110_VALUE,
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4 = DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4_VALUE,
> + DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4T = DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4T_VALUE,
> };
>
> struct dsa_switch;
> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_rtl8_4.c b/net/dsa/tag_rtl8_4.c
> index 02686ad4045d..d80357cb74b0 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/tag_rtl8_4.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_rtl8_4.c
> @@ -84,87 +84,133 @@
> #define RTL8_4_TX GENMASK(3, 0)
> #define RTL8_4_RX GENMASK(10, 0)
>
> -static struct sk_buff *rtl8_4_tag_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> - struct net_device *dev)
> +static void rtl8_4_write_tag(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> + void *tag)
> {
> struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
> - __be16 *tag;
> -
> - skb_push(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
> -
> - dsa_alloc_etype_header(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
> - tag = dsa_etype_header_pos_tx(skb);
> + __be16 tag16[RTL8_4_TAG_LEN / 2];
>
> /* Set Realtek EtherType */
> - tag[0] = htons(ETH_P_REALTEK);
> + tag16[0] = htons(ETH_P_REALTEK);
>
> /* Set Protocol; zero REASON */
> - tag[1] = htons(FIELD_PREP(RTL8_4_PROTOCOL, RTL8_4_PROTOCOL_RTL8365MB));
> + tag16[1] = htons(FIELD_PREP(RTL8_4_PROTOCOL, RTL8_4_PROTOCOL_RTL8365MB));
>
> /* Zero FID_EN, FID, PRI_EN, PRI, KEEP; set LEARN_DIS */
> - tag[2] = htons(FIELD_PREP(RTL8_4_LEARN_DIS, 1));
> + tag16[2] = htons(FIELD_PREP(RTL8_4_LEARN_DIS, 1));
>
> /* Zero ALLOW; set RX (CPU->switch) forwarding port mask */
> - tag[3] = htons(FIELD_PREP(RTL8_4_RX, BIT(dp->index)));
> + tag16[3] = htons(FIELD_PREP(RTL8_4_RX, BIT(dp->index)));
> +
> + memcpy(tag, tag16, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
Why not just cast tag to __be16 and avoid an extra memcpy for each xmit?
> +}
> +
> +static struct sk_buff *rtl8_4_tag_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + skb_push(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
> +
> + dsa_alloc_etype_header(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
> +
> + rtl8_4_write_tag(skb, dev, dsa_etype_header_pos_tx(skb));
>
> return skb;
> }
>
> -static struct sk_buff *rtl8_4_tag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> - struct net_device *dev)
> +static struct sk_buff *rtl8_4t_tag_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + /* Calculate the checksum here if not done yet as trailing tags will
> + * break either software and hardware based checksum
> + */
> + if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL && skb_checksum_help(skb))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + rtl8_4_write_tag(skb, dev, skb_put(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN));
> +
> + return skb;
> +}
> +
> +static int rtl8_4_read_tag(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> + void *tag)
> {
> - __be16 *tag;
> u16 etype;
> u8 reason;
> u8 proto;
> u8 port;
> + __be16 tag16[RTL8_4_TAG_LEN / 2];
nit: Reverse christmas-tree order?
>
> - if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN)))
> - return NULL;
> -
> - tag = dsa_etype_header_pos_rx(skb);
> + memcpy(tag16, tag, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
Likewise can you avoid this memcpy?
>
> /* Parse Realtek EtherType */
> - etype = ntohs(tag[0]);
> + etype = ntohs(tag16[0]);
> if (unlikely(etype != ETH_P_REALTEK)) {
> dev_warn_ratelimited(&dev->dev,
> "non-realtek ethertype 0x%04x\n", etype);
> - return NULL;
> + return -EPROTO;
> }
>
> /* Parse Protocol */
> - proto = FIELD_GET(RTL8_4_PROTOCOL, ntohs(tag[1]));
> + proto = FIELD_GET(RTL8_4_PROTOCOL, ntohs(tag16[1]));
> if (unlikely(proto != RTL8_4_PROTOCOL_RTL8365MB)) {
> dev_warn_ratelimited(&dev->dev,
> "unknown realtek protocol 0x%02x\n",
> proto);
> - return NULL;
> + return -EPROTO;
> }
>
> /* Parse REASON */
> - reason = FIELD_GET(RTL8_4_REASON, ntohs(tag[1]));
> + reason = FIELD_GET(RTL8_4_REASON, ntohs(tag16[1]));
>
> /* Parse TX (switch->CPU) */
> - port = FIELD_GET(RTL8_4_TX, ntohs(tag[3]));
> + port = FIELD_GET(RTL8_4_TX, ntohs(tag16[3]));
> skb->dev = dsa_master_find_slave(dev, 0, port);
> if (!skb->dev) {
> dev_warn_ratelimited(&dev->dev,
> "could not find slave for port %d\n",
> port);
> - return NULL;
> + return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> + if (reason != RTL8_4_REASON_TRAP)
> + dsa_default_offload_fwd_mark(skb);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sk_buff *rtl8_4_tag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(rtl8_4_read_tag(skb, dev, dsa_etype_header_pos_rx(skb))))
> + return NULL;
> +
> /* Remove tag and recalculate checksum */
> skb_pull_rcsum(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
>
> dsa_strip_etype_header(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
>
> - if (reason != RTL8_4_REASON_TRAP)
> - dsa_default_offload_fwd_mark(skb);
> + return skb;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sk_buff *rtl8_4t_tag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct net_device *dev)
> +{
I wonder if it's necessary to check pskb_may_pull() here too.
> + if (skb_linearize(skb))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(rtl8_4_read_tag(skb, dev, skb_tail_pointer(skb) - RTL8_4_TAG_LEN)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, skb->len - RTL8_4_TAG_LEN))
> + return NULL;
>
> return skb;
> }
>
> +/* Ethertype version */
> static const struct dsa_device_ops rtl8_4_netdev_ops = {
> .name = "rtl8_4",
> .proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4,
> @@ -172,7 +218,28 @@ static const struct dsa_device_ops rtl8_4_netdev_ops = {
> .rcv = rtl8_4_tag_rcv,
> .needed_headroom = RTL8_4_TAG_LEN,
> };
> -module_dsa_tag_driver(rtl8_4_netdev_ops);
>
> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +DSA_TAG_DRIVER(rtl8_4_netdev_ops);
> +
> MODULE_ALIAS_DSA_TAG_DRIVER(DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4);
> +
> +/* Tail version */
> +static const struct dsa_device_ops rtl8_4t_netdev_ops = {
> + .name = "rtl8_4t",
> + .proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4T,
> + .xmit = rtl8_4t_tag_xmit,
> + .rcv = rtl8_4t_tag_rcv,
> + .needed_tailroom = RTL8_4_TAG_LEN,
> +};
> +
> +DSA_TAG_DRIVER(rtl8_4t_netdev_ops);
> +
> +MODULE_ALIAS_DSA_TAG_DRIVER(DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4L);
> +
> +static struct dsa_tag_driver *dsa_tag_drivers[] = {
> + &DSA_TAG_DRIVER_NAME(rtl8_4_netdev_ops),
> + &DSA_TAG_DRIVER_NAME(rtl8_4t_netdev_ops),
> +};
> +module_dsa_tag_drivers(dsa_tag_drivers);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-18 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-18 6:09 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: dsa: realtek: add rtl8_4t tag Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-02-18 6:09 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: dsa: tag_rtl8_4: add rtl8_4t trailing variant Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-02-18 11:46 ` Alvin Šipraga [this message]
2022-02-22 0:37 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-02-18 6:09 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: dsa: realtek: rtl8365mb: add support for rtl8_4t Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-02-18 12:26 ` Alvin Šipraga
2022-02-22 2:42 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-02-22 12:20 ` Alvin Šipraga
2022-02-22 19:54 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d9spfct.fsf@bang-olufsen.dk \
--to=alsi@bang-olufsen.dk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arinc.unal@arinc9.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=luizluca@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.