From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_arm_planes_on_crtc()
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:38:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d9v5exn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211090629.15555-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> No reason the high level intel_update_crtc() needs to know
> that there is something magical about the commit order of
> planes between different platforms. So let's hide that
> detail even better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h | 6 ++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 6 +-----
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 3355eb637eac..bba2f105b7dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -716,8 +716,8 @@ void intel_update_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> -void skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +static void skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> @@ -751,8 +751,8 @@ void skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> -void i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +static void i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> @@ -777,6 +777,17 @@ void i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> +void intel_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
I don't much like the intel_arm_ prefix here. I'd go for intel_plane_
something or other.
Can be fixed while applying, or later. *shrug*
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9)
> + skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> + else
> + i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> +}
> +
> int intel_atomic_plane_check_clipping(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> int min_scale, int max_scale,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> index 9822b921279c..b7973e932e78 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> @@ -46,10 +46,8 @@ void intel_plane_destroy_state(struct drm_plane *plane,
> struct drm_plane_state *state);
> void intel_update_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> -void skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> -void i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +void intel_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 3f68fb656fb5..aac1695657df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -7796,7 +7796,6 @@ static void intel_enable_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> @@ -7824,10 +7823,7 @@ static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> commit_pipe_pre_planes(state, crtc);
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
> - skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> - else
> - i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> + intel_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
>
> commit_pipe_post_planes(state, crtc);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-16 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-11 9:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Move intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes() & co. out Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_arm_planes_on_crtc() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:38 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-02-16 12:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 12:57 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Introduce scaled_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use {active, scaled}_planes to compute ilk watermarks Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Remove gen6_check_mch_setup() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add REG_GENMASK64() and REG_FIELD_GET64() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 18:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:57 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:59 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:59 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-16 10:12 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Polish ilk+ wm register bits Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Patchwork
2022-02-11 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d9v5exn.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.