From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: huangy81@chinatelecom.cn
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] cpus-common: implement dirty page limit on vCPU
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 17:02:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dcn5729.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <692eeb1960338ff0ae027a42192e264d55342e7b.1638267948.git.huangy81@chinatelecom.cn> (huangy's message of "Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:28:13 +0800")
huangy81@chinatelecom.cn writes:
> From: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
>
> Implement dirtyrate calculation periodically basing on
> dirty-ring and throttle vCPU until it reachs the quota
> dirty page rate given by user.
>
> Introduce qmp commands set-dirty-limit/cancel-dirty-limit to
> set/cancel dirty page limit on vCPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> cpus-common.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/core/cpu.h | 9 +++++++++
> qapi/migration.json | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> softmmu/vl.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cpus-common.c b/cpus-common.c
> index 6e73d3e..86c7712 100644
> --- a/cpus-common.c
> +++ b/cpus-common.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
> #include "hw/core/cpu.h"
> #include "sysemu/cpus.h"
> #include "qemu/lockable.h"
> +#include "sysemu/dirtylimit.h"
> +#include "sysemu/cpu-throttle.h"
> +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> +#include "qapi/error.h"
> +#include "qapi/qapi-commands-migration.h"
>
> static QemuMutex qemu_cpu_list_lock;
> static QemuCond exclusive_cond;
> @@ -352,3 +357,46 @@ void process_queued_cpu_work(CPUState *cpu)
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&cpu->work_mutex);
> qemu_cond_broadcast(&qemu_work_cond);
> }
> +
> +void qmp_set_dirty_limit(int64_t idx,
> + uint64_t dirtyrate,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + if (!kvm_enabled() || !kvm_dirty_ring_enabled()) {
> + error_setg(errp, "setting a dirty page limit requires KVM with"
> + " accelerator property 'dirty-ring-size' set'");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + dirtylimit_calc();
> + dirtylimit_vcpu(idx, dirtyrate);
> +}
> +
> +void qmp_cancel_dirty_limit(int64_t idx,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + if (!kvm_enabled() || !kvm_dirty_ring_enabled()) {
> + error_setg(errp, "KVM with accelerator property 'dirty-ring-size'"
> + " not set, abort canceling a dirty page limit");
> + return;
> + }
Is this check actually needed? It's not when !dirtylimit_enabled(idx).
> +
> + if (!dirtylimit_enabled(idx)) {
> + error_setg(errp, "dirty page limit for the CPU %ld not set", idx);
"for CPU"
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(!dirtylimit_cancel_vcpu(idx))) {
I don't think unlikely() matters here.
> + dirtylimit_calc_quit();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void dirtylimit_setup(int max_cpus)
> +{
> + if (!kvm_enabled() || !kvm_dirty_ring_enabled()) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + dirtylimit_calc_state_init(max_cpus);
> + dirtylimit_state_init(max_cpus);
> +}
> diff --git a/include/hw/core/cpu.h b/include/hw/core/cpu.h
> index e948e81..11df012 100644
> --- a/include/hw/core/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/core/cpu.h
> @@ -881,6 +881,15 @@ void end_exclusive(void);
> */
> void qemu_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
>
> +/**
> + * dirtylimit_setup:
> + *
> + * Initializes the global state of dirtylimit calculation and
> + * dirtylimit itself. This is prepared for vCPU dirtylimit which
> + * could be triggered during vm lifecycle.
> + */
> +void dirtylimit_setup(int max_cpus);
> +
> #define SSTEP_ENABLE 0x1 /* Enable simulated HW single stepping */
> #define SSTEP_NOIRQ 0x2 /* Do not use IRQ while single stepping */
> #define SSTEP_NOTIMER 0x4 /* Do not Timers while single stepping */
> diff --git a/qapi/migration.json b/qapi/migration.json
> index bbfd48c..57c9a63 100644
> --- a/qapi/migration.json
> +++ b/qapi/migration.json
> @@ -1850,6 +1850,49 @@
> { 'command': 'query-dirty-rate', 'returns': 'DirtyRateInfo' }
>
> ##
> +# @set-dirty-limit:
> +#
> +# Set the upper limit of dirty page rate for a virtual CPU.
> +#
> +# Requires KVM with accelerator property "dirty-ring-size" set.
> +# A virtual CPU's dirty page rate is a measure of its memory load.
> +# To observe dirty page rates, use @calc-dirty-rate.
> +#
> +# @cpu-index: index of the virtual CPU.
> +#
> +# @dirty-rate: upper limit for the specified vCPU's dirty page rate (MB/s)
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +#
> +# Example:
> +# {"execute": "set-dirty-limit"}
> +# "arguments": { "cpu-index": 0,
> +# "dirty-rate": 200 } }
> +#
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'set-dirty-limit',
> + 'data': { 'cpu-index': 'int', 'dirty-rate': 'uint64' } }
> +
> +##
> +# @cancel-dirty-limit:
> +#
> +# Cancel the dirty page limit for the vCPU which has been set with
> +# set-dirty-limit command. Note that this command requires support from
> +# dirty ring, same as the "set-dirty-limit" command.
> +#
> +# @cpu-index: index of the virtual CPU to cancel the dirty page limit
I'd go with
# @cpu-index: index of the virtual CPU.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +#
> +# Example:
> +# {"execute": "cancel-dirty-limit"}
> +# "arguments": { "cpu-index": 0 } }
> +#
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'cancel-dirty-limit',
> + 'data': { 'cpu-index': 'int' } }
> +
> +##
> # @snapshot-save:
> #
> # Save a VM snapshot
> diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
> index 620a1f1..0f83ce3 100644
> --- a/softmmu/vl.c
> +++ b/softmmu/vl.c
> @@ -3777,5 +3777,6 @@ void qemu_init(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> qemu_init_displays();
> accel_setup_post(current_machine);
> os_setup_post();
> + dirtylimit_setup(current_machine->smp.max_cpus);
> resume_mux_open();
> }
QAPI schema:
Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-02 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-30 10:28 [PATCH v7 0/3] support dirty restraint on vCPU huangy81
[not found] ` <cover.1638267948.git.huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
2021-11-30 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] migration/dirtyrate: implement vCPU dirtyrate calculation periodically huangy81
2021-11-30 13:04 ` Peter Xu
2021-11-30 15:10 ` Hyman Huang
2021-11-30 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] cpu-throttle: implement vCPU throttle huangy81
2021-11-30 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] cpus-common: implement dirty page limit on vCPU huangy81
2021-11-30 13:21 ` Peter Xu
2021-11-30 15:25 ` Hyman Huang
2021-12-02 16:02 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2021-12-03 1:19 ` Hyman Huang
2021-11-30 12:57 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] support dirty restraint " Peter Xu
2021-11-30 14:57 ` Hyman Huang
2021-11-30 16:04 ` Hyman Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dcn5729.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=huangy81@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.