From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9157986495 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 06:45:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck In-Reply-To: <20211005174532-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20210930163503.51200-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <87a6jn1ka9.fsf@redhat.com> <20211005174532-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:45:12 +0200 Message-ID: <877deq1wjr.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] virtio-iommu: Rework the bypass feature Content-Type: text/plain To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, sebastien.boeuf@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com List-ID: On Tue, Oct 05 2021, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:57:50PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 30 2021, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> > \item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS (3)] >> > - When not attached to a domain, endpoints downstream of the IOMMU >> > - can access the guest-physical address space. >> > + This feature is deprecated. >> >> "and must not be negotiated." ? >> >> Not sure if we should add normative statements for that. > > We can't just make existing art de jure illegal. > > So SHOULD NOT and yes needs confirmance statements. > Given documentation is already there why remove it? Right, let's make that SHOULD NOT. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org