From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com,
jiang.wang@bytedance.com, Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v6 0/8] sock_map: clean up and refactor code for BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:32:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dn0470s.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210220052924.106599-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 06:29 AM CET, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
>
> This patchset is the first series of patches separated out from
> the original large patchset, to make reviews easier. This patchset
> does not add any new feature or change any functionality but merely
> cleans up the existing sockmap and skmsg code and refactors it, to
> prepare for the patches followed up. This passed all BPF selftests.
>
> To see the big picture, the original whole patchset is available
> on github: https://github.com/congwang/linux/tree/sockmap
>
> and this patchset is also available on github:
> https://github.com/congwang/linux/tree/sockmap1
>
> ---
Thanks for the effort. It definitely looks like an improvement to me.
-Jakub
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-22 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-20 5:29 [Patch bpf-next v6 0/8] sock_map: clean up and refactor code for BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 1/8] bpf: clean up sockmap related Kconfigs Cong Wang
2021-02-22 8:51 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-22 23:23 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 2/8] skmsg: get rid of struct sk_psock_parser Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 3/8] bpf: compute data_end dynamically with JIT code Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 4/8] skmsg: move sk_redir from TCP_SKB_CB to skb Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:20 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-22 19:27 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-23 17:52 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-23 18:04 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-23 18:36 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 5/8] sock_map: rename skb_parser and skb_verdict Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:28 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-22 19:32 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 6/8] sock_map: make sock_map_prog_update() static Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:29 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 7/8] skmsg: make __sk_psock_purge_ingress_msg() static Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:30 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 8/8] skmsg: get rid of sk_psock_bpf_run() Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:31 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-22 12:32 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dn0470s.fsf@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=jiang.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.