All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/display: add phy, vbt and ddi indexes
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 18:23:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dvnl0o6.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d05fl1t1.fsf@intel.com>

On Wed, 01 Jul 2020, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
>> Identify 3 possible cases in which the index numbers can be different
>> from the "port" and add them to the description-based ddi initialization
>> table.  This can be used in place of additional functions mapping from
>> one to the other.  Right now we already cover part of this by creating kind of
>> virtual phy numbering, but that comes with downsides:
>>
>> a) there's not really a "phy numbering" in the spec, this is purely a
>> software thing; hardware uses whatever they want thinking mapping from
>> one to the other arbitrarily is easy in software.
>>
>> b) currently the mapping occurs on "leaf" functions, making the decision
>> based on the platform for each of those functions
>>
>> With this new table the approach will be: the port, as defined by the
>> enum port, is merely a driver convention and won't be used anymore to
>> define the register offset or register bits. For that we have the other
>> 3 indexes, identified as being possibly different from the current usage
>> of register bits: ddi, vbt and phy. The phy type is also added here,
>> meant to replace the checks for combo vs tc.
>>
>> v2: Rebase and add RKL
>>
>
> I guess I'd like to see where the *_idx fields will lead before
> advocating for this.
>
> With them removed,

Ahem, ddi_idx and vbt_idx - obviously phy_idx is used, and I approve of
the use.

Another comment inline below.

>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> But I'm also not saying you can't have them - until I see where this
> leads. ;)
>
> One comment inline below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  | 64 ++++++++++---------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h  |  8 +++
>>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  4 ++
>>  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index c234b50212b0..d591063502c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -16806,57 +16806,59 @@ static void intel_pps_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  }
>>  
>>  static const struct intel_ddi_port_info rkl_ports[] = {
>> -	{ .name = "DDI A",   .port = PORT_A },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI B",   .port = PORT_B },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC1", .port = PORT_D },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC2", .port = PORT_E },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x0, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x0, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x1, .phy_idx = 0x1, .vbt_idx = 0x1, },
>> +	/* TODO: use continguous namespace for port once driver is converted */
>> +	{ .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_D, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x3, .phy_idx = 0x2, .vbt_idx = 0x2, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI D", .port = PORT_E, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x4, .phy_idx = 0x3, .vbt_idx = 0x3, },
>>  	{ .port = PORT_NONE }
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct intel_ddi_port_info tgl_ports[] = {
>> -	{ .name = "DDI A",   .port = PORT_A },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI B",   .port = PORT_B },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC1", .port = PORT_D },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC2", .port = PORT_E },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC3", .port = PORT_F },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC4", .port = PORT_G },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC5", .port = PORT_H },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC6", .port = PORT_I },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI A",   .port = PORT_A, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x0, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x0, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI B",   .port = PORT_B, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x1, .phy_idx = 0x1, .vbt_idx = 0x1, },
>> +	/* TODO: use continguous namespace for port once driver is converted */
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC1", .port = PORT_D, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_DKL,   .ddi_idx = 0x3, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x2, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC2", .port = PORT_E, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_DKL,   .ddi_idx = 0x4, .phy_idx = 0x1, .vbt_idx = 0x3, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC3", .port = PORT_F, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_DKL,   .ddi_idx = 0x5, .phy_idx = 0x2, .vbt_idx = 0x4, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC4", .port = PORT_G, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_DKL,   .ddi_idx = 0x6, .phy_idx = 0x3, .vbt_idx = 0x5, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC5", .port = PORT_H, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_DKL,   .ddi_idx = 0x7, .phy_idx = 0x4, .vbt_idx = 0x6, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC6", .port = PORT_I, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_DKL,   .ddi_idx = 0x8, .phy_idx = 0x5, .vbt_idx = 0x7, },
>>  	{ .port = PORT_NONE }
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct intel_ddi_port_info ehl_ports[] = {
>> -	{ .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI D", .port = PORT_D },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x0, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x0, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x1, .phy_idx = 0x1, .vbt_idx = 0x1, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x2, .phy_idx = 0x2, .vbt_idx = 0x2, },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI D", .port = PORT_D, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x3, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x3, },
>>  	{ .port = PORT_NONE }
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct intel_ddi_port_info icl_ports[] = {
>> -	{ .name = "DDI A",   .port = PORT_A },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI B",   .port = PORT_B },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC1", .port = PORT_C },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC2", .port = PORT_D },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC3", .port = PORT_E },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI TC4", .port = PORT_F },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI A",   .port = PORT_A, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x0, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x0,},
>> +	{ .name = "DDI B",   .port = PORT_B, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_COMBO, .ddi_idx = 0x1, .phy_idx = 0x1, .vbt_idx = 0x1,},
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC1", .port = PORT_C, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_MG,    .ddi_idx = 0x2, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x2,},
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC2", .port = PORT_D, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_MG,    .ddi_idx = 0x3, .phy_idx = 0x1, .vbt_idx = 0x3,},
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC3", .port = PORT_E, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_MG,    .ddi_idx = 0x4, .phy_idx = 0x2, .vbt_idx = 0x4,},
>> +	{ .name = "DDI TC4", .port = PORT_F, .phy_type = PHY_TYPE_MG,    .ddi_idx = 0x5, .phy_idx = 0x3, .vbt_idx = 0x5,},
>>  	{ .port = PORT_NONE }
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct intel_ddi_port_info gen9lp_ports[] = {
>> -	{ .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A, .ddi_idx = 0x0, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x0 },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B, .ddi_idx = 0x1, .phy_idx = 0x1, .vbt_idx = 0x1 },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C, .ddi_idx = 0x2, .phy_idx = 0x2, .vbt_idx = 0x2 },
>>  	{ .port = PORT_NONE }
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct intel_ddi_port_info ddi_ports[] = {
>> -	{ .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI D", .port = PORT_D },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI E", .port = PORT_E },
>> -	{ .name = "DDI F", .port = PORT_F },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A, .ddi_idx = 0x0, .phy_idx = 0x0, .vbt_idx = 0x0 },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B, .ddi_idx = 0x1, .phy_idx = 0x1, .vbt_idx = 0x1 },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C, .ddi_idx = 0x2, .phy_idx = 0x2, .vbt_idx = 0x2 },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI D", .port = PORT_D, .ddi_idx = 0x3, .phy_idx = 0x3, .vbt_idx = 0x3 },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI E", .port = PORT_E, .ddi_idx = 0x4, .phy_idx = 0x4, .vbt_idx = 0x4 },
>> +	{ .name = "DDI F", .port = PORT_F, .ddi_idx = 0x5, .phy_idx = 0x5, .vbt_idx = 0x5 },
>>  	{ .port = PORT_NONE }
>>  };
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> index b7a6d56bac5f..22c999a54ff1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> @@ -311,6 +311,14 @@ enum phy {
>>  	I915_MAX_PHYS
>>  };
>>  
>> +enum phy_type {
>> +	PHY_TYPE_NONE = 0,
>> +
>> +	PHY_TYPE_COMBO,
>> +	PHY_TYPE_MG,
>> +	PHY_TYPE_DKL,
>> +};
>> +
>>  #define phy_name(a) ((a) + 'A')
>>  
>>  enum phy_fia {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>> index 92cc7fc66bce..df587219c744 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>> @@ -1436,6 +1436,10 @@ struct intel_dp_mst_encoder {
>>  struct intel_ddi_port_info {
>>  	const char *name;
>>  	enum port port;
>> +	s8 phy_type;
>
> Please make the type enum phy_type.
>
>> +	u8 ddi_idx;
>> +	u8 phy_idx;

I think we should retain enum phy as type for this too. I generally
think this gives people a better grasp that you shouldn't convert it to
some other generic integer nilly-willy. Also, if we need to change this
later on, tooling (cocci, tagging tools, etc.) are more helpful with
enums.

BR,
Jani.

>> +	u8 vbt_idx;
>>  };
>>  
>>  static inline enum dpio_channel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-25  0:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/6] display/ddi: keep register indexes in a table Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-25  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915: move ICL port F hack to intel_bios Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-30 15:54   ` Jani Nikula
2020-06-25  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/display: fix comment on skl straps Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-30 15:55   ` Jani Nikula
2020-07-01 15:35     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-03 13:24       ` Jani Nikula
2020-06-25  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/display: start description-based ddi initialization Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-01 14:20   ` Jani Nikula
2020-07-01 15:35     ` Jani Nikula
2020-07-01 15:42       ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-01 15:40     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-25  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/display: add phy, vbt and ddi indexes Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-01 14:58   ` Jani Nikula
2020-07-01 15:23     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-07-01 16:43       ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-01 17:04   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-07-01 17:24     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-02 14:18       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-06-25  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/display: use port_info in intel_ddi_init Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-01 15:24   ` Jani Nikula
2020-07-05 20:15   ` kernel test robot
2020-07-05 20:15     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/display: replace port to phy conversions in intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-01 15:17   ` Jani Nikula
2020-07-01 16:52     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-26 11:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for display/ddi: keep register indexes in a table Patchwork
2020-06-26 11:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-06-26 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877dvnl0o6.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.