From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:33:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e00p7n4.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304125118.12335-1-anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
On Wed, 04 Mar 2020, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
> Few edp panels like Sharp is triggering short and long
> hpd pulse after panel is getting powered off.
> Currently driver is already ignoring long pulse for eDP
> panel but in order to process the short pulse, it turns on
> the VDD which requires panel power_cycle_delay + panel_power_on_delay
> these delay on Sharp panel introduced the responsiveness overhead
> of 800ms in the modeset sequence and as well is in suspend
> sequence.
> Ignoring any short pulse once panel is powered off.
>
> FIXME: It requires to wait for panel_power_off_delay in order
> to check the panel status, as panel triggers short pulse immediately
> after writing PP_OFF to PP_CTRL register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 0a417cd2af2b..93de015f5322 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -6763,10 +6763,24 @@ static const struct drm_encoder_funcs intel_dp_enc_funcs = {
> .destroy = intel_dp_encoder_destroy,
> };
>
> +static bool is_edp_powered_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
We have a number of existing edp_ prefixed functions, with intel_
prefixed wrappers. Please make this intel_edp_have_panel_power(). Early
return false for non-eDP.
Also handle intel_dp_is_edp() in the caller so it's clear what's being
done.
> +{
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + bool powerd_off = false;
> +
> + if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> + with_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> + powerd_off = !edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp);
> + }
> +
> + return powerd_off;
> +}
> +
> enum irqreturn
> intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_dig_port->dp;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>
> if (long_hpd && intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) {
> /*
> @@ -6810,6 +6824,11 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
> if (!intel_dp->is_mst) {
> bool handled;
>
> + if (is_edp_powered_off(intel_dp)) {
I would move this to the beginning of the function in the same if
statement as the long_hpd handling:
if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
(long_hpd || !intel_edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp)))
But makes me wonder if that should be changed to ignore all hpd from eDP
if there's no panel power nor vdd. Ville?
> + drm_info(&i915->drm, "edp panel is off, ignoring the short pulse\n");
drm_dbg_kms() will be enough.
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +
> handled = intel_dp_short_pulse(intel_dp);
>
> if (!handled)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 12:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-04 13:33 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-03-04 18:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 3:17 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-09 8:50 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-13 18:47 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-04 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for " Patchwork
2020-03-04 17:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-05 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-03-13 18:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-17 17:54 ` Jani Nikula
2020-03-18 8:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] " Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-18 9:38 ` Jani Nikula
2020-03-23 8:35 ` Shankar, Uma
2020-03-16 15:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off (rev2) Patchwork
2020-03-16 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-03-18 9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off (rev3) Patchwork
2020-03-18 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877e00p7n4.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.