From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D233AC33CAA for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DFDA21734 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="fWpI1q74" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9DFDA21734 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48602 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itmAZ-0005sM-SI for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:33:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38399) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itm9y-0005SK-Ny for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:33:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itm9w-0003lc-IH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:33:05 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:37830 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itm9w-0003ku-2i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:33:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579584782; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iX9rdrOgW6eXhs6U7rsdfxpXKdEc94deRi7vmjrQuiA=; b=fWpI1q74pJIdIjEX1/t+g0wHwz8izVhzSqphekiMNnJ2TcjLpivZbUZJVhg6O2YqhCNxlv gmc137mEB+3oMM9H5aGVFtXuNua+fKCloi4ivISYuxFMdkqyCyYiKwSywt+3ITbK71wI8z 0rjevRkMzPkmDW2IMLZ0/ts/2vcvDK8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-29-pP8xcB7UPf6gNO--xQczsA-1; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:33:02 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A6F9184AD2A; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-116-131.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.131]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299F45D9D6; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80C0A1138600; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 06:32:51 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] What should a virtual board emulate? References: <20190319144013.26584-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <87imwe847x.fsf_-_@dusky.pond.sub.org> <9b92b3c4-c5d5-9a51-7b96-50dcf113ee5a@redhat.com> <6b5459b5-deb2-e70c-deab-fa7246b43e38@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 06:32:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6b5459b5-deb2-e70c-deab-fa7246b43e38@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:46:17 +0100") Message-ID: <877e1lml18.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-MC-Unique: pP8xcB7UPf6gNO--xQczsA-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Gerd Hoffmann , Aleksandar Markovic , Aleksandar Rikalo , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Aurelien Jarno Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 04/01/20 22:16, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: >> 1/ the Radeon chip is soldered on the motherboard, >>=20 >> 2/ the default BIOS expects the Radeon chip to be >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 unconditionally present, >>=20 >> I insist this patch is incorrect for the particular case of the >> Fuloong2e board. I plan to revert it when I post the test. >>=20 >> BTW I'm not using --nodefault, I'm running default ./configure: >>=20 >> qemu-system-mips64el -M fulong2e -bios pmon_2e.bin \ >> -display none -vga none -serial stdio > > But if you're not specifying -nodefaults, why are you specifying a > configuration that your BIOS does not support? You should just remove > -vga none and leave in -display none. Is there any use for -vga none with this machine? If no, then rejecting it cleanly would be nicer than having the machine hang.